Current issue

The Korean Society for Journalism & Communication Studies - Vol. 64 , No. 5

[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies - Vol. 64, No. 5, pp.248-285
Abbreviation: KSJCS
ISSN: 2586-7369 (Online)
Print publication date 31 Oct 2020
Received 12 Jun 2020 Revised 14 Sep 2020 Accepted 05 Oct 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2020.64.5.007

국가경제에 대한 미디어 의제 구성 : 신문과 방송 경제뉴스 데이터(1998-2017) 분석을 통해 본 의제의 현저성과 위계성
이완수* ; 신명환**
*동서대학교 미디어커뮤니케이션학부 부교수 (wansoo1960@gmail.com)
**경성대학교 LINC+ 겸임교수 (shin_comm@naver.com)

Media Agenda Building on the National Economy : Salience and Hierarchy of the Agenda in Newspaper and Broadcasting Economic News Data(1998-2017)
Wan Soo Lee* ; Myoung Hwan Shin**
*Associate Professor, Broadcasting & Media Studies, Dongseo University (wansoo1960@gmail.com)
**Adjunct Professor, LINC+ , KyungSung University, corresponding author (shin_comm@naver.com)

초록

이 연구는 한국 언론이 현저하게 강조하는 경제의제가 무엇인지를 알아보기 위해 의제형성 이론을 적용해 실증적 분석을 시도했다. 이를 위해 이 연구는 20년간 장기 시계열 데이터를 바탕으로 미디어가 구성하는 경제의제의 현저성이 매체특성, 정부시기, 정부이념, 경기상황, 보도시제에 따라 어떤 차이를 보이는지를 빈도분석으로 살펴보았다. 분석결과, 한국 언론들은 국가경제 문제 가운데 경기동향, 주가, 물가인플레이션, 환율금리, 경제정책 순으로 경제의제를 현저하게 다뤘다. 매체별 분석에서 신문은 경제정책이나 경기동향과 같은 거시경제 의제를, 방송은 시장물가, 주식시장, 금융시장 등 실물경제에 관련된 미시경제 의제를 상대적으로 많이 다뤘다. 특히 공영방송은 무역수지나 경제성장률과 같은 통계경제에 대한 추상적 의제를, 상업방송은 시장물가, 주식시장, 금융시장과 같은 실물경제 의제를 각각 현저하게 다뤘다. 정부별 분석결과, 김대중과 노무현 정부시기에는 경기동향과 주식시장이, 이명박 정부시기에는 시장물가와 환율금리가, 박근혜 정부시기에는 경기동향과 경제정책이 각각 상대적으로 더 현저하게 다뤄졌다. 이들 정부를 이념으로 구분해 살펴본 결과에서는 진보정부 시기동안에는 경기동향과 주식시장이, 보수정부 시기동안에는 경기동향, 시장물가, 그리고 금융시장에 대한 보도의제 비율이 높았다. 경기 국면별 분석에서는 경기동향에 대한 보도의제가 경기국면에 관계없이 가장 많은 가운데, 경기수축기에는 경제정책이나 환율금리가, 경기확장기에는 주식시장, 물가시장, 무역수지에 대한 보도의제가 상대적으로 많았다. 보도의 준거시점에 따른 의제 현저성 분석에서는 과거의 경우 무역수지와 실업률이, 현재는 주가, 금리환율이, 미래의 경우는 경제정책과 경제전망에 대한 의제 현저성이 두드러졌다. 본 연구는 경제의제의 현저성과 위계가 미디어 조직을 둘러싼 다양한 내·외부 조건이나 정치경제적 환경에 따라 다르게 결정된다는 관점을 중심으로 논의했다.

Abstract

This study attempted an empirical analysis by applying the agenda building theory to find out what economic agenda Korean media remarkably emphasizes. To this end, this study examined how the salience of economic agenda constituted by the media based on long-term time series data for 20 years(1998-2017) differs according to media characteristics, government period, government ideology, economic situation, and reporting tense. Result shows that Korean media remarkably dealt with economic agenda in the order of economic trends, stock prices, inflation, exchange/interest rates, and economic policies among national economic issues. In the analysis by media, newspapers dealt with macroeconomic agendas such as economic policies and economic trends, while broadcasting dealt with microeconomic agendas related to the real economy such as consumption markets, stock markets, and financial markets. In particular, public broadcasting dealt with abstract agendas for statistical economy such as trade balance and economic growth rate, while commercial broadcasting dealt with concrete agendas such as market price, stock market, and financial market. As for the result of analysis by government, economic trends and stock markets during the Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun administrations, market prices and exchange rates during the Lee Myung-bak administration, and economic trends and economic policies during the Park Geun-hye administration were dealt with relatively more prominently. The results of dividing these governments by ideology show that during the period of the liberal government, economic trends and stock markets were more salient, and during the period of the conservative government, the rate of reporting on economic trends, market prices, and financial markets was high. For the result of the analysis of business cycle, the agenda on economic policy or exchange/interest rates during the economic contraction period, and the stock market, inflation, and trade balance during the economic expansion period were remarkable. In the analysis of the agenda salience according to the reference point of the report, the trade balance and unemployment rate were mainly reported in the past tense, the stock price and exchange/interest rate in the present tense, and economic policy and economic outlook in the future tense. This study discussed the viewpoint that the salience and hierarchy of the economic agenda is determined differently depending on various internal and external conditions surrounding the media organization or political and economic environment.


Keywords: National economy, Economic news, Economic agenda, Agenda-building, Agenda salience
키워드: 국가경제, 경제뉴스, 경제의제, 의제형성, 의제 현저성

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by Dongseo University, “Dongseo Cluster Project” Research Fund of 2020(DSU-20200009)(이 연구는 동서대학교 2020년도 “동서 클러스터 프로젝트” 펀드로 수행되었다).


References
1. Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1994). Riding the wave and claiming ownership over issues: The joint effects of advertising and news coverage in campaigns. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58(3), 335-357.
2. Arts, F., Takeshita, T., & Becker, L. (2002, July). Economic News and Perceptions of the Economy: Results from the Netherlands, Japan and United States. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the IAMCR, Barcelona, Spain.
3. Benton, M., & Frazier, P. J. (1976). The agenda setting function of the mass media at three levels of" Information Holding". Communication Research, 3(3), 261-274.
4. Behr, R. L., & Iyengar, S. (1985). Television news, real-world cues, and changes in the public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49(1), 38-57.
5. Blood, D. J., & Phillips, P. C. (1995). Recession headline news, consumer sentiment, the state of the economy and presidential popularity: A time series analysis 1989–1993. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 7(1), 2-22.
6. Blood, D. J., & Phillips, P. C. (1997). Economic headline news on the agenda: New approaches to understanding causes and effects. Communication and democracy. Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-setting Theory, 97-113
7. Boydstun, A. E., Highton, B., & Linn, S. (2018). Assessing the relationship between economic news coverage and mass economic attitudes. Political Research Quarterly, 71(4), 989-1000.
8. Brosius, H., & Eps, P. (1994). The role of key events in news selection: Framing in coverage of attacks against foreigners and asylum seekers in Germany. Paper presented at International Communication Association, Sydney, Australia.
9. Chernov, G., & McCombs, M. (2019). Philosophical orientations and theoretical frameworks in media effects: Agenda setting, priming and their comparison with framing. Agenda Setting Journal, 3(1), 63-81.
10. Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1972). Individual orientations in the study of political symbolism. Social Science Quarterly, 53(1), 79-90.
11. Cobb, R., Ross, J. K., & Ross, M. H. (1976). Agenda building as a comparative political process. American Political Science Review, 70(1), 126-138.
12. Dearing, J. W., Rogers, E. M., & Rogers, E. (1996). Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Erbring, L., Goldenberg, E. N., & Miller, A. H. (1980). Front-page news and real-world cues: A new look at agenda-setting by the media. American Journal of Political Science, 24(1), 16-49.
14. Funkhouser, G. R. (1973). The issues of the sixties: An exploratory study in the dynamics of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(1), 62-75.
15. Hazell, R., & Yong, B. (2012). The politics of coalition: How the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Government works. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
16. Hester, J. B., & Gibson, R. (2003). The economy and second-level agenda setting: A time-series analysis of economic news and public opinion about the economy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(1), 73-90.
17. Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53-78.
18. Ju, Y. (2008). The asymmetry in economic news coverage and its impact on public perception in South Korea. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(2), 237-249.
19. Ju, Y. (2014). Issue obtrusiveness and negative bias: exploring the moderating factors for asymmetric news coverage of the economy. Asian Journal of Communication, 24(5), 441-455.
20. Kalogeropoulos, A. (2018). Economic news and personal economic expectations. Mass Communication and Society, 21(2), 248-265.
21. Kostadinova, P., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2012). Communicating policy change: Media framing of economic news in post-communist Bulgaria. European Journal of Communication, 27(2), 171-186.
22. Lee, N. Y., & Baek, K. H. (2016). Changes in south korean economic news from 1994 to 2014: Focusing on the watchdog role of journalism. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 60(4), 203-231.
23. Lee, W. S. (2012). Economics & communication. Seoul: Spinning Wheel of Time.
24. Lee, W. S., & Shim, J. C. (2017). Empirical analysis of economic communication effect theory path, direction, intensity, persistence test among korean economic time series variables. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 61(1), 36-77.
25. Lee, W. S., & Pae, J. K. (2016). Multi-dimensional factors on the quality of economic news: Focus group interview for the koreas economic news producers and specialized media professional groups. Journal of Media Economics & Culture, 14(4), 102-149.
26. Lee, W. S., & Kim, D. Y. (2011). Surge, decline and emphasize: Portrayals of media on socioeconomic Index. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 55(6), 304-330.
27. Lee, W. S., & Park, J. Y. (2008). The tone of economy news during the Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun government. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 52(4), 5-24.
28. Lischka, J. A. (2014). Different revenue incentives, different content? Comparing economic news before and during the financial crisis in German public and commercial news outlets over time. European Journal of Communication, 29(5), 549-566.
29. Lischka, J. A. (2016). Economic news and the real economy. In J. A. Lischka (Ed.), Economic News, Sentiment, and Behavior (pp. 41-56). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
30. León, B. (2008). Science related information in European television: a study of prime-time news. Public Understanding of Science, 17(4), 443-460.
31. Lopez-Escobar, E., Llamas, J. P., McCombs, M., & Lennon, F. R. (1998). Two levels of agenda setting among advertising and news in the 1995 Spanish elections. Political Communication, 15(2), 225-238.
32. López-Rabadán, P., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2012). Evolution of the Spanish media agenda (1980-2010). Longitudinal analysis of the front pages of two of the most important Spanish newspapers. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 67, 459-480.
33. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
34. Nisbet, M. C. (2008). Agenda Building. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), In The International Encyclopedia of Communication (pp. 140-145). New York, NY: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781405186407.wbieca035
35. Noelle-Neumann, E., & Mathes, R. (1987). Theevent as event'and theevent as news': The significance ofconsonance'for media effects research. European Journal of Communication, 2(4), 391-414.
36. Nowak, E. (2016). Agenda-setting theory and the new media. Studia Medioznawcze Media Studies, 3(66), 11-24.
37. Park, R. E. (1922). The immigrant press and its control. New York, NY: Harper & brothers.
38. Reese, S. D., Daly, J. A., & Hardy, A. P. (1987). Economic news on network television. Journalism Quarterly, 64(1), 137-144.
39. Rogers, E. M., Dearing, J. W., Rao, N., Campo, S., Meyer, G., Betts, G. J., & Casey, M. K. (1995). Communication and community in a city under siege: The AIDS epidemic in San Francisco. Communication Research, 22(6), 664-678.
40. Sheafer, T., & Weimann, G. (2005). Agenda building, agenda setting, priming, individual voting intentions, and the aggregate results: An analysis of four Israeli elections. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 347-365.
41. Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message. White Plains, NY: Longman.
42. Soroka, S. N. (2014). Negativity in democratic politics: Causes and consequences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Soroka, S. N. (2002). Agenda-setting dynamics in Canada. Vancouver: UBC press.
44. Soroka, S., Andrew, B., Aalberg, T., Iyengar, S., Curran, J., Coen, S., Hayashi, K., Jones, P., Mazzoleni, G., Rhee, J. W., Rowe, D., & Tiffen, R. (2013). Auntie knows best? Public broadcasters and current affairs knowledge. British Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 719-739.
45. Soroka, S. N., Stecula, D. A., & Wlezien, C. (2015). It's (change in) the (future) economy, stupid: economic indicators, the media, and public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 59(2), 457-474.
46. Takeuchi, K. (2011). Non-parametric test of time consistency: Present bias and future bias. Games and Economic Behavior, 71(2), 456-478.
47. Takeshita, T., & Mikami, S. (1995). How did mass media influence the voters’ choice in the 1993 general election in Japan? A study of agenda setting. Keio Communication Review, 17(3), 27-41.
48. Tomono, N. (2007). Behavioral Economics. Seoul: Jihyung.
49. Wlezien, C., Soroka, S., & Stecula, D. (2017). A Cross‐National Analysis of the Causes and Consequences of Economic News. Social Science Quarterly, 98(3), 1010-1025.
50. Wu, H. D., & Coleman, R. (2009). Advancing agenda-setting theory: The comparative strength and new contingent conditions of the two levels of agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(4), 775-789.
51. Wu, H. D., McCracken, M. W., & Saito, S. (2004). Economic Communication in the ‘Lost Decade’ News Coverage and the Japanese Recession. Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands), 66(2), 133-149.
52. Wu, H. D., Stevenson, R. L., Chen, H. C., & Güner, Z. N. (2002). The conditioned impact of recession news: A time‐series analysis of economic communication in the United States, 1987–1996. International Journal ofPublic Opinion Research, 14(1), 19-36.
53. Zahariadis, N. H. (2016). Handbook of public policy agenda setting. Cheltenman, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

부록
1. 도모노 노리오 (2007). <행동경제학>. 서울: 지형.
2. 이나연·백강희 (2016). 1994~2014년 한국 경제뉴스의 변화. <한국언론학보>, 60권 4호, 203-231.
3. 이완수 (2012). <경제와 커뮤니케이션>. 서울: 시간의 물레.
4. 이완수·김동률 (2011). 오름, 내림 그리고 강조: 사회경제지표에 대한 미디어의 구성방식. <한국언론학보>, 55권 6호, 304-330.
5. 이완수·박재영 (2008). 국내 경제뉴스 보도경향에 대한 연구. <한국언론학보>, 52권 4호, 5-24.
6. 이완수·배정근 (2016). 경제 뉴스 품질에 미치는 다차원적 요인 탐구. <미디어 경제와 문화>, 14권 4호, 102-149.
7. 이완수·심재철 (2017). 경제커뮤니케이션 효과이론에 대한 실증적 분석. <한국언론학보>, 61권 1호, 36-77.