Current issue

The Korean Society for Journalism & Communication Studies - Vol. 65 , No. 6
[Paper List] [Go to Volume List]

[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies - Vol. 65, No. 6, pp. 372-415
Abbreviation: KSJCS
ISSN: 2586-7369 (Online)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2021
Received 11 Jun 2021 Accepted 01 Dec 2021 Revised 07 Dec 2021
https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2021.65.6.009

상반된 정치 진영의 가짜 뉴스 담론과 사회적 사실
강주현**
**부산대학교 지역혁신역량교육연구센터 연구교수 (kmunhak@pusan.ac.kr)

Fake news discourse and social facts of opposite political camps
Ju Hyun Kang**
**Research Professor, Regional Entrepreneurship Education Research Center, Pusan National University (kmunhak@pusan.ac.kr)
Funding Information ▼
초록

이 연구는 우리 사회의 가짜 뉴스 담론을 정치 진영에 따라 어떻게 다르게 해석할 수 있는지를 알아보기 위해 상반된 정치 성향의 활동가 10명을 대상으로 심층 인터뷰를 실시했다. 이들은 상대 측 진영의 허위 정보가 정치적 목적성을 띤 ‘의도’가 있다고 주장하며 가짜 뉴스 담론을 정치 성향에 따라 다르게 해석했다. 가짜 뉴스를 규정할 때 ‘가짜인줄 알면서도’의 의미는 상대 정치 진영에서 추측하고 단정하는 의도일 뿐이며, 의혹을 제기하는 당사자들은 ‘진짜라고 믿는’, ‘의심스러운’의 의미를 더 강하게 담고 있다. 나아가 ‘허위 정보’라는 규정 역시 어떤 경우 진실이 명확하게 해명되지 않은 상태에서 진영적 시각이 반영되어 있다.

이들의 진술을 살펴보면 정치 담론을 어떻게 받아들이느냐에 따라 가짜 뉴스론이 될 수도 있고, 가짜 뉴스 프레임론이 될 수도 있다. 정치 담론의 생산과 확산 과정은 작은 사실(fact), 언론 보도에 설명 가능한 추론과 해석이 덧붙여지며 새로운 메시지가 생성되었다는 점을 추정할 수 있다. 특히 정보의 접근성과 투명성이 제한될 때 사실 확인이 어려운 상태에서 정치 진영 내부의 추론과 해석, 확산이 늘어날 개연성이 있다. 상대 정치 진영에 대한 신뢰가 낮을 때 의혹을 해명할 정보의 선택적 제공, 공개 토론 기피는 부분적 사실을 근거로 해당 이슈에 대한 주장과 해석을 재생산하는 환경을 조성할 수 있다.

Abstract

This study looked at fake news claims and fake news frames claims through in-depth interviews with 10 people with opposing political views. Although they belong to different political camps and pay attention to different fake news cases, they have a negative attitude toward fake news or disinformation itself. Most of them perceived fake news as false information produced and disseminated due to political necessity of the opposing political camp. However, the interviewees of this study, who were highly political, judged fake news and political intentions differently depending on their political views. Defining fake news in terms of intention, i.e. 'even though one knows it's fake', which is mentioned as an important attribute when talking about fake news, was only an intention to speculate and conclude by the political camp because the other party raising suspicion leans strongly toward "believing to be real" and "suspicious." In addition, the regulation of 'false information' may also reflect the position of the camp. This is because certain factions defined it as false information, but other factions raised suspicions based on certain facts. So, in political discourse, when a political camp concluded that it was "fake news," it could be accepted as a "fake news frame" that is stigmatized for political purposes.

The case covered in this study suggests that transparency of information can control the spread of fake news. Fake news discourse is created by adding inferences and interpretations based on partial facts. At this time, people who do not have information, who do not have the power to acquire or manage information, are placed in an environment where they have no choice but to participate in the production and spread of fake news with suspicion. On the other hand, those who have information can only highlight certain facts and turn the opposing party's claims into fake news. When trust in particular political camp is low, the non-disclosure and selective provision of necessary information and avoidance of public discussion can create an environment that reproduces claims and interpretations on the issue based on partial facts.

If the suspected social issue is fake news, it may be possible to reduce the number of disputes over the truth when actively disclosing information and allowing viewers to judge through open discussions. In other words, in order to solve the fake news problem, there is a need to actively and transparently disclose the information when there is an issue or suspicion raised.

Keywordsfake news, fake news frame, social facts, different interpretation, information transparency
키워드: 가짜 뉴스, 가짜 뉴스 프레임, 사회적 사실, 다른 해석, 정보의 투명성
Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF-2019S1A5B5A07112343)(이 논문은 2019년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원(시간강사연구지원사업)을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2019S1A5B5A07112343).

References
1. Ahn, K.-S. (2020, 4, 15). [Lecture] Surprisingly, this is the thing that has the biggest impact on virus spread! Seoul National University Virus Emergency Special Lecture. [On-Line]. Chaos Science. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeGbLqVVq7o
2. Barthes, R. (1957). Mythologies. Paris: Editions du Seuil
3. Baudrillard, J. (1981). Simulacres et simulation. Paris: Éditions Galilée.
4. Carabine, J. (2001). Unmarried motherhood 1830-1990: A genealogical analysis. In Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 267-310). London: Open University Press.
5. Choi, B.-S. (2020, May, 4). “I don’t understand the statistical results of the early voting… The National Election Commission is responsible for clearing the suspicion.”. Chosun Ilbo. URL: https://www.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2020/05/04/2020050400098.html?utm_source=naver&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=naver-news
6. Choi, H.-J. (2020, May, 28) Min Kyung-wook, "Self-verification is nonsense" at the public demonstration of voting and counting by the National Election Commission. Maeil Economy. URL: https://www.mk.co.kr/news/politics/view/2020/05/546146/
7. Choi, Y.-S. (2012). Critical Review on the Habermass Pragmatics of Communication: Through the Perspective of Deleuzes Pragmatics. Communication Theories, 8(1), 101-141.
8. Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Deleuze, G. (1968). Différence et répétition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
10. Eo, D.-S. (2002). Lacan and literary criticism: Intertextuality, interpretation, and transfer. In Kim, S.-G., & Hong, J.-K. (Eds.), The rebirth of Lacan (pp. 607-637). Seoul: Creation and Criticism.
11. Fiske. J. (1990). Introduction to communication studies. UK: Routledge.
12. Garland, R. (2018). Is post-truth another word for political spin or a radical departure from it? Evidence from behind the scenes in UK government communications: 1997–2015. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 14(3), 333-350.
13. Garrett, R. K., & Stroud, N. J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: differences in pro- and counter attitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64, 680-701.
14. Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
15. Habermas, J. (1987). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
16. Hankyoreh (2010, July, 27). [Original text] Data on the results of review of the ‘Cheonan’ by the Russian Naval Experts Group. Hankyoreh. URL: https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/politics/defense/432224.html
17. Huh, Y.-A. (2020, April, 20). Kim Jong-un recently underwent cardiovascular surgery… Still undergoing special treatment. Daily NK. URL: https://www.dailynk.com/%ea%b9%80%ec%a0%95%ec%9d%80-%ec%b5%9c%ea%b7%bc-%ec%8b%ac%ed%98%88%ea%b4%80-%ec%8b%9c%ec%88%a0-%eb%b0%9b%ec%95%98%eb%8b%a4%ec%97%ac%ec%a0%84%ed%9e%88-%ed%8a%b9%ea%b0%81%ec%84%9c-%ec%b9%98/
18. Hwang, J.-B. (2020, April, 22). Trump: "I don't know... I wish you well”. Hankyoreh. URL: https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/international/international_general/941477.html
19. Hwang, Y.-S., & Kwon, O.-S. (2017). A Study on the conceptualization and regulation measures on fake news focused on selfregulation of internet service providers. Journal of Media Law, Ethics and Policy Research, 16(1), 53-101.
20. In, S.-Y. (2021, May, 23). "The Korean judiciary should promptly recount election fraud lawsuits". Finance Today. URL: http://www.fntoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=256819
21. Jeon, K.-J., Lee, J-H., Lee, J-B., & Jeong H.-B. (2020, October, 9). Police 'relief of barriers' - Conservative group 'conference meeting'... There were no major clashes. Hankyoreh. URL: https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general/965199.html
22. Jeong, A.-R., & Kim, S.-H. (2017). The public enemy as a constructed reality: Understanding the quality of news about North Korea. Culture and Politics, 4(4), 111-143.
23. Jeong, Y.-J. (2020, December, 26). North Korean leader Kim Jong-un ranks second in 'the most searched person' this year. YTN. URL: https://www.ytn.co.kr/_ln/0104_202012260950017226
24. Jung, Y.-J., Hong, J.-Y., & Park, Y.-J. (2021). Regulatory responses to disinformation that infringes on social legal interests. Journal of Media Law, Ethics and Policy Research, 20(1), 73-114.
25. Kang, J. H. (2019). The attributes of fake news discourse and the direction of social practice in media reports. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 63(6), 7-64.
26. Kendeou, Robinson, & McCrudden (2019). Misinformation and disinformation in education. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
27. Kim, C.-S., & Hong, J.-H. (2020). How fake news become ‘real’ news on Youtube: A case study of political propagandization and reaction among political actors related to the 〈Gosung Wildfire〉. The Journal of Political Science & Communication, 23(2), 403-439.
28. Kim, J.-S. (2020, April, 25). The commonality of 'Kim Il-sung death theory' and 'Kim Jong-un criticality theory'. Ohmynews. URL: http://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/View/at_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=A0002636207&CMPT_CD=P0010&utm_source=naver&utm_medium=newsearch&utm_campaign=naver_news
29. Kim, K.-K. (2020). The Advent of the Post-truth era, fake news, and Max Weber. Korean Journal of Social Theory, 2020 Fall/Winter, 199-247.
30. Kim, M.-C. (2020, May, 28). Election Commission held a demonstration that excluded those who raised suspicions, "Election fraud is impossible"... Min Kyung-wook "Self-verification doesn't make sense". Pennmike. URL: http://www.pennmike.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=31927
31. Kim, S.-G., & Han, H. J. (2014). Cheonan Patrol Combat Corvette Sinking and Media Control : A Production Study on Investigative Programs. Korean Journal of Communication & Information, 66, 242-272.
32. Kim, S.-J., & Lee, C.-H. (2002). An Experimental Study on the Effects of Television News Frame. Korean Journal of Communication & Information, 19, 95-123
33. Kumar, D. (2006). Media, war, and propaganda: strategies of information management during the 2003 Iraq War. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies. 3(1), 48-69.
34. Lee, B.-O. (2006). Die hermeneutische Rolle des Subjekts in der Medienkultur. Phenomenology and Contemporary Philosoph, 30, 219-240.
35. Lee, S.-Y. (2002). Lacan and Film Criticism: A Korean political film approached from Lacan's ideological concept. In Kim, S.-G., & Hong, J.-K. (Ed.) (2002). The rebirth of Lacan (pp.638-661). Seoul: Creation and Criticism.
36. Lee, Y.-J., & Kwon, E.-E. (2020). Fake news and foci of literacy education in the Post-truth Era. The Korean Journal of Literacy Research, 11(6), 101-134.
37. Levi-Strauss, C. (1964). Mythologiques. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Lilleker, D. G., & Liefbroer, M. (2018). ‘Searching for something to believe in’: Voter uncertainty in a post-truth environment. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 14(3), 277–282.
39. McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
40. Moon, J.-W. (2021). How to Introduce Electronic Voting within Constitutional Limits. Public Law Journal, 22(1), 157-182.
41. Nam, S.-W. (2019, February, 5). Is solar power really eco-friendly? Hankook Ilbo. URL: https://www.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/201902051201055118
42. Oh, C.-H. (2014). A Study of communication function of broadcast journalism on the basis of G. Deleuzes language theory from the fact paradigm to the event paradigm. Locality & Communication, 18(2), 89-124.
43. Oh, S. W., Jeong, S.-H., & Park, A. R. (2017). Fake news status and issues. Seoul: Korea Press Foundation.
44. Park, A.-R. (2019). A critical perspective on regulating fake news & disinformation, Journal of communication research, 56(2), 113-155.
45. Park, H.-W. (2011). Subject, the Other, communication: Rethinking communication with Levinas. Media & Society, 19(2), 225-267.
46. Park, J.-H. (2020, August). [Issue Diagnosis] Controversy over the 4·15 election “The spread of suspicion is poison to the conservatives” vs “The issue of sovereignty of the people regardless of left and right”, Monthly Chosun. URL: http://monthly.chosun.com/client/news/viw.asp?ctcd=C&nNewsNumb=202008100023
47. Park, J.-S. (2020, May, 28). Demonstration of casting and ballot counting, disassembling ballot papers... The National Election Commission refutes 'election rigging'. Hankook Ilbo. URL: https://www.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/202005281954725195
48. Park, S.-G. (2020, October, 11). Joo Ho-young “Those who build fortresses will perish… Can we stop people's anger with 'Jaein-sanseong'?". Chosun Ilbo. URL:https://www.chosun.com/politics/assembly/2020/10/11/FT7CIUW4LFBGBGMZMTWPWUN7PE/?utm_source=naver&utm_medium=original&utm_campaign=news
49. Poulakidakos, S., Veneti, A., & Fangonikolopoulos, C. (2018). Post-truth, propaganda and the transformation of the spiral of silence. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 14(3), 367-382.
50. Salek, T. A., & Cole, A. W. (2019). Donald Trump tweets the 2014 Ebola outbreak: The infectious nature of apocalyptic counterpublic rhetoric and constitution of an exaggerated health crisis. Communication Quarterly, 67(1), 21-40.
51. Salgado, S. (2018). Online media impact on politics. Views on post truth politics and postmodernism. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 14(3), 317-331.
52. Seo, D.-W. (2002). Lacan and Deleuze: Deleuze's desiring machine and Lacan's partial impulse-Lacan's interpretation of Spinoza's theory of desire. In Kim, S.-G., & Hong, J.-K. (Eds.). The rebirth of Lacan (pp.414-463). Seoul: Creation and Criticism.
53. Seoul National University Media Information Research Center (2020, 8, 31). Fact Check Details. URL: https://factcheck.snu.ac.kr/v2/facts/2478
54. Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
55. Shin, J.-H. (2021, March, 31). Kyung-Jun Yoo “Mibain thesis error… There is very little possibility of early voting manipulation”. KBS. URL: https://news.kbs.co.kr/news/view.do?ncd=5151961&ref=A
56. Song, W.-G. (2020, May, 18). "Korea's fraudulent voting rate, top 15%... High probability of election fraud" Professor Mibein's 4th article. New Daily. URL: https://www.newdaily.co.kr/site/data/html/2020/05/18/2020051800209.html
57. Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60, 556-576.
58. Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. UK: Oxford.
59. Waisbord, S. (2018). Truth is what happens to news: On journalism, fake news, and post-truth. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1866–1878.
60. Yang, M.-J. (2020). North Korea fake news: type, distribution, and counter plan. Review of North Korean Studies, 23(2), 90-122.
61. Yoo, E.-S. (2018). Legal regulation of fake news: Focusing on the protection of societal legal interest. Journal of Media Law, Ethics and Policy Research, 17(2), 39-68.
62. Yoon, B.-R. (2020, October, 20). Mountain solar power, new construction becomes more difficult, and safety management is strengthened. Yonhap News. URL: https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20201020080400003?input=1195m
63. Yum, J.-Y., & Jeong, S.-H. (2018). Research on fake news perception and fact-checking effect: Role of prior-belief consistency. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 62(2), 41-80.
64. Yu, S-K., Chung, J.-I., & Li, S. (2010). A comparative analysis of ‘Cheon-an ham Attack’ news coverage of New York Times and People’s Daily. Media, Gender & Culture, 16, 105-141.
65. Zompetti, J. P. (2019). The Fallacy of Fake News: Exploring the Commonsensical Argument Appeals of Fake News Rhetoric through a Gramscian Lens. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, 9(3/4), 139-159.
부록Ⅰ. 국문 참고문헌
1. 강주현 (2019). 언론 보도에 나타난 가짜뉴스 담론의 속성과 사회적 실천 방향. <한국언론학보>, 63(6), 7-64.
2. 김광기 (2020). 포스트 투루스시대의 도래와 가짜뉴스, 그리고 베버의 효용. <사회이론>, 2020 가을/겨울. 199-247.
3. 김민찬 (2020, 5, 28). 선관위, 의혹 제기자들 배제한 시연회 열어 “부정선거 불가능하다”…민경욱 “셀프 검증 말이 안돼”. <펜앤드마이크>. URL: http://www.pennmike.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=31927
4. 김상균·한희정 (2014). 천안함 침몰 사건과 미디어 통제. <한국언론정보학보>, 66, 242-272.
5. 김성준·이창현 (2002). 북한 관련 TV뉴스의 프레이밍 방식에 따른 수용자의 인식 변화에 대한 실험연구. <한국언론정보학보>, 19, 95-123.
6. 김종성 (2020, 4, 25). ‘김일성 사망설’과 ‘김정은 위독설’의 공통점. <오마이뉴스>. URL: http://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/View/at_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=A0002636207&CMPT_CD=P0010&utm_source=naver&utm_medium=newsearch&utm_campaign=naver_news
7. 김춘식·홍주현 (2020). 유튜브 공간에서 ‘가짜뉴스의 뉴스화’: 〈고성산불〉 관련 정치적 의혹 제기와 청와대 반응 사례 연구. <정치정보연구>, 23(2), 403-439.
8. 남상욱 (2019, 2, 5). 태양광 발전은 정말 친환경일까. <한국일보>. URL: https://www.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/201902051201055118
9. 문재완 (2021). 공직선거 전자투표의 합헌적 실시방안. <공법학연구>, 22(1), 157-182.
10. 박상기 (2020, 10, 11). 주호영 “성을 쌓는 자 망하리라…‘재인산성’으로 국민 분노 막겠나”. <조선일보>. URL: https://www.chosun.com/politics/assembly/2020/10/11/FT7CIUW4LFBGBGMZMTWPWUN7PE/?utm_source=naver&utm_medium=original&utm_campaign=news
11. 박아란 (2019). 가짜뉴스와 온라인 허위정보(disinformation) 규제에 대한 비판적 검토. <언론정보연구>, 56(2), 113-155.
12. 박준석 (2020, 5, 28). 투ㆍ개표 시연하고 투표지 분해하고… ‘선거조작’ 반박 나선 선관위. <한국일보>. URL: https://www.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/202005281954725195
13. 박지현 (2020, 8월). [이슈진단] 4·15 부정선거 논란 “의혹 확산은 보수에 毒” vs “左右 관계없는 국민 主權 문제”, <월간 조선>. URL: http://monthly.chosun.com/client/news/viw.asp?ctcd=C&nNewsNumb=202008100023
14. 박홍원 (2011). 주체, 타자, 커뮤니케이션: 레비나스와 함께 커뮤니케이션을 다시 생각하기. <언론과 사회>, 19(2), 225~267.
15. 서동욱 (2002). 라깡과 들뢰즈: 들뢰즈의 욕망하는 기계와 라깡의 부분 충동-스피노자적 욕망이론의 라깡 해석. 김상기·홍준기 (편), <라깡의 재탄생> (414~463쪽). 서울: 창작과 비평사.
16. 서울대학교 언론정보연구소 (2020, 8, 31). 팩트체크 상세보기. URL: https://factcheck.snu.ac.kr/v2/facts/2478.
17. 송원근 (2020, 5, 18). “한국 부정투표 비율, 상위 15%… 선거부정 가능성 높다” 미베인 교수 4차 논문. <뉴데일리>. URL: https://www.newdaily.co.kr/site/data/html/2020/05/18/2020051800209.html
18. 신지혜 (2021, 3, 31). 유경준 “미베인 논문 오류…사전투표 조작 가능성 거의 없어”. <KBS>. URL: https://news.kbs.co.kr/news/view.do?ncd=5151961&ref=A
19. 안광석 (2020, 4, 15). [강연] 바이러스 전파에 가장 큰 영향을 미치는 것은 의외로 이것!! | 서울대 바이러스 긴급특강. <카오스 사이언스>. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeGbLqVVq7o
20. 양무진 (2020). 북한 관련 가짜뉴스: 유형, 유통과 대응 방안. <현대북한연구>, 23(2), 90-122.
21. 어도선 (2002). 라깡과 문학비평: 상호텍스트성·해석·전이. 김상기·홍준기 (편), <라깡의 재탄생> (607~637쪽). 서울: 창작과 비평사.
22. 염정윤·정세훈 (2018). 가짜뉴스에 대한 인식과 팩트체크 효과 연구. <한국언론학보>, 62(2), 41-80.
23. 오세욱·정세훈·박아란 (2017). <가짜뉴스 현황과 문제점>. 서울: 한국언론진흥재단.
24. 오창호 (2014). 들뢰즈(G. Deleuze)의 언어이론으로 본 방송저널리즘의 소통기능에 대한 고찰: ‘사실의 패러다임’에서 ‘사건의 패러다임’으로. <지역과 커뮤니케이션>, 18(2), 89-124.
25. 유세경·정지인·이석 (2010). 미국과 중국 일간지의 ‘천안함 침몰 사건’ 뉴스 보도 비교 분석. <미디어, 젠더 & 문화>, 16, 105-141.
26. 유의선 (2018). 가짜뉴스의 법적 규제. <언론과법>, 17(2), 39-68.
27. 윤보람 (2020, 10, 20). 산지태양광, 신규건설 까다로워지고 안전관리 강화된다. <연합뉴스>. URL: https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20201020080400003?input=1195m
28. 이병옥 (2006). 매체문화에서 주체의 해석학적 역할. <현상학과 현대철학>, 30, 219-240.
29. 이수연 (2002). 라깡과 영화비평: 라깡의 이데올로기 개념으로 접근한 한국 정치영화. 김상기·홍준기 (편), <라깡의 재탄생> (638~661쪽). 서울: 창작과 비평사.
30. 이용준·권이은 (2020). Post-truth 시대의 가짜 뉴스와 리터러시 교육의 중점. <리터러시연구>, 11(6), 101-134.
31. 인세영 (2021, 5, 23). “대한민국 사법부는 부정선거소송 재검표를 조속히 실시하라”. <파이낸스투데이>. URL: http://www.fntoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=256819
32. 전광준·이재호·이주빈·정환봉 (2020, 10, 9). 경찰 ‘차벽 완화’-보수단체 ‘회견집회’…큰 충돌은 없었다. <한겨레>. URL: https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general/965199.html
33. 정아름·김성해 (2017) 공공의 적 북한은 만들어진다. <문화와 정치>, 4(4), 111-143.
34. 정영주·홍종윤·박유진 (2021). 사회적 법익을 침해하는 허위조작정보 대응을 위한 시론적 논의 -코로나19 관련 허위조작정보를 중심으로-. <언론과법>, 20(1), 73-114.
35. 정윤주 (2020, 12, 26). ‘위독설’ 北 김정은, 올 한 해 ‘가장 많이 검색한 인물’ 2위. <YTN>. URL: https://www.ytn.co.kr/_ln/0104_202012260950017226
36. 최보식 (2020, 5, 4). “사전투표 결과 통계적으로 이해안돼… 선관위, 의혹 풀어줄 책임있어”. <조선일보>. URL: https://www.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2020/05/04/2020050400098.html?utm_source=naver&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=naver-news
37. 최영송 (2012). 들뢰즈 관점에서 본 하버마스 화용론의 한계. <커뮤니케이션 이론>, 8(1), 101-141.
38. 최현주 (2020, 5, 28) 민경욱, 선관위 투·개표 공개시연에 “셀프 검증 말도 안돼”. <매일경제>. URL: https://www.mk.co.kr/news/politics/view/2020/05/546146/
39. 한겨레 (2010, 7, 27). [원문] 러시아 해군 전문가그룹의 ‘천안함’ 검토 결과 자료. <한겨레>. URL: https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/politics/defense/432224.html
40. 허윤아 (2020, 4, 20). 김정은, 최근 심혈관 시술 받았다…여전히 특각서 치료 중. <데일리 NK>. URL: https://www.dailynk.com/%ea%b9%80%ec%a0%95%ec%9d%80-%ec%b5%9c%ea%b7%bc-%ec%8b%ac%ed%98%88%ea%b4%80-%ec%8b%9c%ec%88%a0-%eb%b0%9b%ec%95%98%eb%8b%a4%ec%97%ac%ec%a0%84%ed%9e%88-%ed%8a%b9%ea%b0%81%ec%84%9c-%ec%b9%98/
41. 황용석·권오성 (2017). 가짜뉴스의 개념화와 규제수단에 관한 연구. <언론과법>, 16(1), 53-101.
42. 황준범 (2020, 4, 22). 트럼프, ‘김정은 위독설’에 “모른다…잘 있기를 바라”. <한겨레>. URL: https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/international/international_general/941477.html
43. Barthes, R. (1957). Mythologies. 이화여자대학교 기호학연구소 역(1997). <현대의 신화>. 서울: 동문선.
44. Baudrillard, J. (1981). Simulacres et simulation. Paris: Éditions Galilée. 하태환 (역) (2001) <시뮬라시옹>. 서울: ㈜ 민음사.
45. Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). 조흥식 ·정선욱 ·김진숙 ·권지성 (공역) (2010). <질적 연구방법론: 다섯가지 전통>. 서울: 학지사.
46. Deleuze, G. (1968). Différence et répétition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. 김상환 (역) (2004). <차이와 반복>. 서울: ㈜민음사.
47. Fiske. J. (1990). Introduction to communication studies. 강태완, 김선남 (공역) (2002). <커뮤니케이션학이란 무엇인가> 서울: 커뮤니케이션 북스.
48. Habermas, J. (1987). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag. 장춘익 (공역) (2006). <의사소통행위이론1: 행위합리성과 사회합리화>. 경기 파주: ㈜ 나남.
49. Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag. 한상진·박영도 (공역) (2007). <사실성과 타당성: 담론적 법이론과 민주적 법치국가 이론>. 경기 파주: ㈜ 나남.
50. Levi-Strauss, C. (1964). Mythologiques 1. 임봉길 (역) (2005). <신화학 1>. 경기 파주: 한길사.