Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
The Korean Society for Journalism & Communication (KSJCS)
[ Journalism Communication ]
Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies - Vol. 62, No. 6, pp.66-108
ISSN: 2586-7369 (Online)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2018
Received 09 Aug 2018 Revised 16 Nov 2018 Accepted 16 Nov 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2018.62.6.003

2009년국회문화체육관광방송통신위원회의 미디어법개정안내환상주제와소그룹 의사결정커뮤니케이션의상징수렴과정연구

박종민* ; 고경아** ; 윤해원***
*경희대학교언론정보학과교수, 주저자및교신저자 jongmin@khu.ac.kr
**경희대학교언론정보학과박사과정 gocopy2@gmail.com
***경희대학교언론정보학과학부과정 yhw1202@naver.com
A Fantasy Themes and Symbolic Convergence in 18th National Assembly Standing Committee's Decision-Making Communication Processing for the Amendment of the Media Law
Park, Jongmin* ; Ko, Kyung A** ; Yoon, Hae Won***
*Professor, Department of Journalism and Communication, Kyung Hee University jongmin@khu.ac.kr
**Doctoral Student, The Graduate School of Journalism and Communication, Kyung Hee University gocopy2@gmail.com
***Department of Journalism and Communication Kyung Hee University yhw1202@naver.com

초록

본연구는지난2009년18대국회에서쟁점이되었던미디어법개정관련상임위원회회의록 을 분석하고 회의과정에서 나타난 국회의원들의 미디어법 개정안 통과과정에서 발현된 상징수 렴 과정을 파악하였으며, 토론에 참여했던 의원들의 소속정당, 연령대 그리고 회의 진행 과정 에 따른 차이를 살펴보았다. 전체사회드라마는 한나라당(여당)의50대 남성위원들이 주도가 되어야당(민주당)과치열한논의를통해, 직권상정을통한헌재판결유효주장의줄거리와미 디어시장 다양화의 대의명분(인가하는 대리인)으로 미디어법 찬성의 환상주제가 합리성의 논 리와수사로반복, 재현, 수렴되고있었다. 과정내정의적주요유추는국회의원의의무충실이 고 사회적 주요유추는 연대와타협, 실용적주요유추는 절차적 효율성이었다. 한편, 찬성의 환 상주제는 ‘미디어법 개정은 변화되는 환경에 효율적으로 대비하는 것이며, 초기회의(1,2차)에 서 강하게 주장하여, 연대를 통해 신속한 절차로 통과시키자’의 집단의식이, 반대는 ‘언론 권한 과 정부 권한의 침해의 비도덕적 개정안으로 국민 대표의 입장에서 마지막(3, 4차 회의)까지 미디어법개정을막자’는집단의식이수렴되고있었다. 경제성, 효율성의수사적재현은소위원 회에서, 도덕성은 본회의에서 많이 논의되었다. 회의 진행 과정 중 초기에는찬성을 위한 경제 성이, 후반에는 미디어법 개정의 도덕성 관련 내용이 더 많이 등장하고 있었다. 또한 40~50 대 위원들은찬반이 명확하고국민 대표성과연대성의 사회 유추, 절차 및결과적효율성의 실 용유추를 많이 표현한 반면, 60대 이상 위원들은 타협성의 사회 유추와 전문성의 실용 유추를 많이표현하고있었다.

Abstract

This study analyzed the agenda of the Standing Committee on the amendment of the media law, which had been controversial in the 18th National Assembly in 2009, and grasped the process of symbolic convergence in the communication process of passing the revision of the media law by the members of the parliament. We looked at the differences in the party members, age groups, and the process of the meetings. The revealed social drama is ‘the leaders of the ruling Grand National Party (GNP) in the 50s in favor of the Constitutional Court’s judgment was reproducing logic and rhetorical expression to agree with the amendment of the media law(fantasy theme) in order to adapt to the diversification of the media market and environmental change(sanctioning agent). The righteous master analogue in the process was the improvement of the duty of the parliamentarian, and the social master analogue were solidarity and compromise. The pragmatic master analogue was the procedural efficiency. The fantasy theme of the pros is to prepare effectively for the changing environment, and the ruling party strongly insisted in the early meetings (first and second) for passage of the law by rapid procedure through solidarity, On the other hand, because the amendment contains the infringement of the government and the press authority, the collective consciousness of stopping the passage of the law until the last (the third and fourth meetings) from the standpoint of the national representative was converging. The rhetorical reproduction of economic efficiency was discussed in the subcommittee, and morality was discussed in the plenary session. In addition, the members of the 40s and 50s expressed a lot of the pros and cons of the social representation, social master analogue of the citizen representation and solidarity, pragmatic master analogue of procedure and result efficiency, while the members of the 60s or older expressed much of the social master analogue of the compromise and the pragmatic master analogue of the expertise.

Keywords:

symbolic convergence theory, fantasy theme, the amendment of the media law, small group decision-making communication, national assembly standing committee

키워드:

상징수렴이론, 환상주제, 미디어법개정, 국회상임위원회, 소그룹의사결정커뮤니케이션

References

  • 김영욱·김찬아(2004). 비영리기금조성활동의상징적현실에관한연구: 기부관련신문특집기사에대한 환상주제분석. <한국비영리연구>, 3권2호, 73-119.
  • 김영욱(2005). 비영리PR과PR커뮤니케이션이론과확장. <한국광고홍보학보>, 7권5호, 7-40.
  • 김옥경(2005). 영화홍보맥락에서의영화비평분석: 환상주제분석을중심으로. 이화여자대학교대학원 석사학위논문.
  • 김태오(2009). 미디어법의주요쟁점및내용. <경제규제와법>, 2권2호, 182-186.
  • 박종민 (2018). Unearthing strategic fantasy themes in human communication through Bormann, Cragan, and Shields' symbolic convergence theory. Asian Communication Research, 15(2), 155-174.
  • 박종민·정영주·권구민(2018). 미디어법개정과정에나타난18대국회상임위원회의의사결정에영향을 미치는커뮤니케이션특성연구의회조직이론, 개인의사결정속성, 조직커뮤니케이션특성, 집단사고징후를중심으로. <한국언론학보>, 62권4호, 44-81.
  • 박종민(2015). 조직커뮤니케이션. 이준웅·박종민·백혜진(편), <커뮤니케이션과학의지평> (105-165쪽). 서울: 나남.
  • 박종민·박경희·최서경 (2013). 여성 성역할에 관한 환상주제의 시대적 변천: 1960-2000년대 <주부생활><신동아> 잡지광고분석을중심으로. <광고연구>, 99권4호, 67-104.
  • 박종민·권구민·김선정·장희경(2013). 트위터를통한정치인자아표현과공중과의상호커뮤니케이션:고프만(E. Goffman)의연극적분석법과틀분석의적용. <한국언론학보>, 57권5호, 155-189.
  • 박종민·권구민(2011). 시·군공식웹사이트내시·군대표인사말의환상주제. <광고연구>, 88권1호, 37-64.
  • 박종민·조의현(2007). 드라마의보복폭력에관한상징수렴연구. <한국방송학보>, 21권6호, 193-240.
  • 박종민·조의현·김의기(2008). 기업소개웹사이트가환상주제와상징수렴: 공기업과사기업의비교분석. <한국언론학보>, 52권1호, 141-172.
  • 박성희(2017). 수사비평. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스.
  • 백진숙(2009). Benoit 의관점에서본‘미디어법’에대한정당의위기관리커뮤니케이션. <한국위기관리논집>, 5권2호, 72-82.
  • 우수명(2013). 마우스로잡는PASWStatistics 20. 서울: 인간과복지
  • 유영옥(2013). 조직문화와조직상징의실제와관리전략. <한국보훈논총>, 12권2호, 211-250.
  • 유재광·오경수(2012). 신문의뉴스프레임과정치인발언보도태도연구-미디어법이슈를중심으로. <정치커뮤니케이션연구>, 26, 73-113.
  • 안주아·신명희·이희복·박종민역(2006). 조직커뮤니케이션: 접근과과정. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스.
  • 이준웅·박종민·백혜진엮음(2015). 커뮤니케이션과학의지평. 서울: 나남.
  • 한균태·박종민·김창숙·서영남 (2008). 효율적 정책집행과정과 정책공중유형별 정책고객관계관리를 위한정책홍보실무자들의인식. <홍보학연구>, 12권1호, 73-109.
  • Aleman, M. W. (2005). Embracing and resisting romantic fantasies as the rhetorical vision on a SeniorNet discussion board. Journal of Communication, 55 (1), 5-21. [https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/55.1.5]
  • Benoit, W. L. (1995). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration strategies. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Bormann, E. G. (1972). Fantasy and rhetorical vision: The rhetorical criticism of social reality. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58 (4), 396-407. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637209383138]
  • Bormann, E. G. (1980). Communication theory. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
  • Bormann, E. G. (1982). Fantasy and rhetorical vision: Ten years later. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 68 (3), 288-305. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638209383614]
  • Bormann, E. G. (1983). Symbolic convergence: Organizational communication and culture. In L. L. Bormann, E. G. (1985a). Symbolic convergence theory: A communication formulation. Journal of Communication, 35 (4), 128-138. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x]
  • Bormann, E. G. (1985b). The force of fantasy: Restoring the America dream. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Bormann, E. G. (1990). Small group communication: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
  • Bormann, E, G., Cragan, J, F., & Shields, D, C. (1994). In defense of symbolic convergence theory: A look at the theory and its criticisms after two decades. Communication Theory, 4 (4), 259-294. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1994.tb00093.x]
  • Bormann, E. G., Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (2001). Three decades of developing, grounding, and using symbolic convergence theory (SCT). Annals of the International Communication Association, 25 (1), 271-313. [https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2001.11679006]
  • Bormann, E. G., Knutson, R. L., & Musolf, K. (1997). Why do people share fantasies? An empirical investigation of a basic tenet of the symbolic convergence communication theory. Communication Studies, 48 (3), 254-276. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979709368504]
  • Chesebro, J.W., Cragan, J.F., & McCullough, P.W. (1973). The small group technique of the radical revolutionary: A synthetic study of consciousness raising. Communication Monographs, 40, 136.146. [https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757309375788]
  • Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (1981). Applied communication research: A dramatistic approach. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
  • Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (1992). The use of symbolic convergence theory in corporate strategic planning: A case study. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20 (2), 199-218. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889209365329]
  • Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (1995). Symbolic theories in applied communication research: Bormann, Burke, and Fisher. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Cragan, J.F., Shields, D.C., & Wright, D.W. (1996). A unified theory of small group communication. In J.F.Cragan & D.W.Wright (Eds.), Theory and research in small group communication (pp. 69- 92). Edina, MN: Burgess.
  • Cragan, J.F., & Wright, D.W. (1999). Communication in small groups: Theory, process, skills, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Duffy, M. E. (2003). Web of hate: A fantasy theme analysis of the rhetorical vision of hate groups online. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 27 (3), 291-312. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859903252850]
  • Endres, T. G. (1994). Co-existing master analogues in symbolic convergence theory: The Knights of Columbus quincentennial campaign. Communication Studies, 45 (3-4), 294-308. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979409368430]
  • Jackson, B. G. (2000). A fantasy theme analysis of Peter Senge's learning organization. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36 (2), 193-209. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886300362005]
  • Lee, S. K. J., & Hoon, T.H. (1993). Rhetorical vision of men and women managers in Singapore. Human Relations, 46, 527-542. [https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600406]
  • Lesch, C.L. (1994). Observing theory in practice: Sustaining consciousness in a coven. In L.R.Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups (pp. 57-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Neher, W. W. (1997). Organizational communication: Challenges of change, diversity and continuity, NeedhamHeights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Park, J., Lee, H., & Hong, H. (2016). The analysis of self-presentation of Fortune 500 corporations in corporate web sites. Business and Society, 55 (5), 706-737. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313512586]
  • Porter, L. W. (1976). The White House transcripts: Group fantasy events concerning the mass media. Central States Communication Journal, 27, 272-279. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10510977609367904]
  • Ogle, J. P., & Thornburg, E. (2003). An alternative voice amid teen 'Zines: An analysis of body-related content in Girl Zone. Journal or Family and Consumer Sciences, 95 (1). 47-56.
  • Seibold, D. R., Meyers, R. A., & Shoham, M. D. (2010). Social influence in groups and organizations. In C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff & D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen (Eds.), The handbook of communication science (pp. 237-253). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412982818.n14]
  • Zanin, A. C., Hoelscher, C. S., & Kramer, M. W. (2016). Extending symbolic convergence theory: A shared identity perspective of a team’s culture. Small Group Research, 47 (4), 438-472. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496416658554]
  • Hossain, M., Islam, M.T., Momin, M.A., Nahar, S., & Alam, M. S. (2018). Understanding communication of sustainability reporting: Application of symbolic convergence theory(SCT). Journal of Business Ethics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3874-6 [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3874-6]