문화적 편향이 기후변화 정책 순응과 지지에 미치는 영향 : 위험인식, 감정, 효능감의 매개 효과 중심 분석

Acknowledgments

이 논문은 2017년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2017S1A5B5A02026015).

References

• 김서용·김선희 (2016). 기후변화 의식과 대응행동 결정요인 분석. <행정논총>, 54권 1호, 179-206.
• 김영욱·김영지·김수현 (2018). 기후변화에 대한 위험 정보 추구 및 처리 연구. <한국언론학보>, 62권 5호, 72-106.
• 김영욱·박단아·민혜민 (2018). 기후 변화에 대한 심리적 거리감이 완화 행동 의도에 미치는 영향. <광고연구>, 118호, 127-170.
• 김현철·조성겸·김학수 (2009). <기후변화관련 사회적 논의의 변화>. 한국언론학회 학술대회 발표논문집, 5-8.
• 나은경·송현주·김현석·이준웅 (2008). 정서의 프레이밍: 경제 뉴스 보도 기사의 정서 반응 유발 효과. <한국언론학보>, 52권 2호, 378-406.
• 노성종·이완수 (2013). ‘지구온난화’ 對 ‘기후변화’. <커뮤니케이션 이론>, 9권 1호, 163-198.
• 박혜영·김영욱 (2017). 지구온난화 이슈에서 낙인에 미치는 영향변수에 대한 연구. <한국언론학보>, 61권 6호, 273-317.
• 박희제·김명심 (2016). 과학기술에 대한 일반시민의 지지도와 정치의식: 사회문제 해결형 연구를 중심으로. <기술혁신연구>, 24권 3호, 107-137.
• 유명순·윤혜정·천진희·주영기 (2017). 국내 뉴스미디어의 기후변화 보도 내용분석. <언론과학연구>, 17권 3호, 105-137.
• 윤순진 (2016). 한국 언론기자의 기후변화 인식과 보도 태도. <환경사회학연구 ECO>, 20권 1호, 7-61.
• 이나경·임혜숙·이영애 (2008). 세계관과 위험지각에서 전문가와 일반인의 차이. <한국심리학회지: 일반>, 27권 3호, 635-651.
• 이일현 (2014). EasyFlow 회귀분석, 한나래출판사.
• 이혁우 (2017). 정책순응 및 불응의 유형화에 관한 연구. <한국사회와 행정연구>, 27권 4호, 241-267.
• 임인재·박성철·이덕환 (2013). 논쟁적 과학이슈에 대한 신문보도 분석. <한국언론학보>, 57권 6호, 469-501.
• 정정길·최종원·이시원·정준금·정광호 (2003). <정책학원론>. 서울: 대명출판사.
• 주영기 (2013). 한국 신문의 정치적 성향에 따른 기후변화 뉴스 프레이밍 차이 연구. <언론과학연구>, 13권 3호, 591-626.
• 하상근 (2014). 사회적 자본이 정책불응에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. <한국정책과학학회보>, 18권 1호, 131-157.
• 한국 경제 연구원 (2015). KERI 경제 동향 URL: http://www.keri.org/web/www/keridb_0101
• 환경부 (2010). 기후변화, 이제는 적응입니다. URL:http://www.me.go.kr/home/file/readDownloadFile.do?fileId=6451&fileSeq=1&openYn=Y
• Anderson, A. (2009). Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research agenda. Sociology Compass, 3(2), 166-182. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00188.x]
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. [https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.84.2.191]
• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122. [https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.37.2.122]
• Bandura, A. (Ed.). (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge university press. [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527692]
• Baron, R., Logan, H., Lilly, J., Inman, M., & Brennan, M. (1994). Negative emotion and message processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(2), 181-201. [https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1994.1009]
• Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Nathan DeWall, C., & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 167-203. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307301033]
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity, Vol. 17. Sage.
• Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
• Bellamy, R., & Hulme, M. (2011). Beyond the tipping point: understanding perceptions of abrupt climate change and their implications. Weather, Climate, and Society, 3(1), 48-60. [https://doi.org/10.1175/2011WCAS1081.1]
• Breakwell, G. M. (2010). Models of risk construction: some applications to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(6), 857-870. [https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.74]
• Calman, K. C. (2001). The language of risk: a question of trust. Transfusion, 41(11), 1326-1328. [https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41111326.x]
• Carmichael, J. T., Brulle, R. J., & Huxster, J. K. (2017). The great divide: understanding the role of media and other drivers of the partisan divide in public concern over climate change in the USA, 2001–2014. Climatic change, 141(4), 599-612. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1908-1]
• Dake, K. (1991). Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk: An analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 22(1), 61-82. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022191221006]
• Dake, K. (1992). Myths of nature: Culture and the social construction of risk. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 21-37. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01943.x]
• Dake K., Wildavsky A. (1991) Individual Differences in Risk Perception and Risk-Taking Preferences. In: Garrick B.J., Gekler W.C. (eds) The Analysis, Communication, and Perception of Risk. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 9. Springer, Boston, MA. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2370-7_2]
• Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.
• Dietz, T., Dan, A., & Shwom, R. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural sociology, 72(2), 185-214. [https://doi.org/10.1526/003601107781170026]
• Dohle, S., Keller, C., & Siegrist, M. (2010). Examining the relationship between affect and implicit associations: Implications for risk perception. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 30(7), 1116-1128. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01404.x]
• Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982) Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Duncan, S. S. (1981). Housing policy, the methodology of levels, and urban research: the case of Castells. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 5(2), 231-254. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1981.tb00553.x]
• Dunlap, R. E., Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2001). Politics and environment in America: Partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism. Environmental Politics, 10(4), 23-48. [https://doi.org/10.1080/714000580]
• Dunwoody, S. (1999). Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science in Friedman, Dunwoody, & Rogers (Eds), Scientists, journalists, and the meaning of uncertainty(pp. 59-79), Routledge.
• Ellis, R. J., & Thompson, F. (1997). Culture and the environment in the Pacific Northwest. American Political Science Review, 91(4), 885-897. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2952171]
• Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1-17. [https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S]
• Giddens, A. (1999). Risk and responsibility. The Modern Law Review, 62(1), 1-10. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00188]
• Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290. [https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566]
• Grendstad, G., & Selle, P. (2018). Cultural theory, postmaterialism, and environmental attitudes. In Culture matters (pp. 151-168). Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429501159-10]
• Griskevicius, V., Cantú, S. M., & Van Vugt, M. (2012). The evolutionary bases for sustainable behavior: Implications for marketing, policy, and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31(1), 115-128. [https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.11.040]
• Grob, A. (1995). A structural model of environmental attitudes and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 209-220. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90004-7]
• Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2002). Extending the theory of planned behavior: Predicting the use of public transportation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(10), 2154-2189. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02068.x]
• Helgeson, J., van der Linden, S., & Chabay, I. (2012). The role of knowledge, learning and mental models in public perceptions of climate change related risks. Learning for Sustainability in Times of Accelerating Change, 329-346. [https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-757-8_21]
• Hood, C. (1995). Control over bureaucracy: cultural theory and institutional variety. Journal of Public Policy, 15(3), 207-230. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00010023]
• Hood, C., James, O., Peters, G., & Scott, C. (2004). Controlling Modern Government: Variety. Commonality and Change, Cheltenham: Elgar. [https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845423599]
• Hood, C., James, O., Scott, C., Jones, G. W., & Travers, T. (1999). Regulation inside government: Waste watchers, quality police, and sleaze-busters. Oxford University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1093/0198280998.001.0001]
• Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 622. [https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943]
• Huxster, J. K., Carmichael, J. T., & Brulle, R. (2015). A Macro Political Examination of the Partisan and Ideological Divide in Aggregate Public Concern over Climate Change in the US between 2001 and 2013. Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 1-15. [https://doi.org/10.5296/emsd.v4i1.6531]
• Jackson, J., Allum, N., & Gaskell, G. (2006). Bridging levels of analysis in risk perception research: the case of the fear of crime. In Forum qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: qualitative social research, 7(1), pp. Art-20. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung.
• Johnson, E. J., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 20-31. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.20]
• Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147-174. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246]
• Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature climate change, 2(10), 732-735. [https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547]
• Kaiser, F. G., & Gutscher, H. (2003). The Proposition of a General Version of the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting Ecological Behavior 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(3), 586-603. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01914.x]
• Keller, C., Bostrom, A., Kuttschreuter, M., Savadori, L., Spence, A., & White, M. (2012). Bringing appraisal theory to environmental risk perception: A review of conceptual approaches of the past 40 years and suggestions for future research. Journal of Risk Research, 15(3), 237–256. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2011.634523]
• Kellstedt, P. M., Zahran, S., & Vedlitz, A. (2008). Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 28(1), 113-126. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.x]
• Kim, S. Y., & Wolinsky-Nahmias, Y. (2014). Cross-national public opinion on climate change: The effects of affluence and vulnerability. Global Environmental Politics, 14(1), 79-106. [https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00215]
• Kobbeltved, T., Brun, W., Johnsen, B. H., & Eid, J. (2005). Risk as feelings or risk and feelings? A cross‐lagged panel analysis. Journal of Risk Research, 8(5), 417-437. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987042000315519]
• Krimsky, S., & Golding, D. (1992). Social theories of risk. Westport and London: Praeger.
• Lai, V. T., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D. (2012). Affective primacy vs. cognitive primacy: Dissolving the debate. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 243. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00243]
• Lazarus, R. S. (1981). A cognitivist’s reply to Zajonc on emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 36, 222–223. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.2.222]
• Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39, 124–129. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.124]
• Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American psychologist, 46(8), 819-834. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.8.819]
• LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The emotional brain. New York: Simon & Schuster.
• Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic change, 77(1-2), 45-72. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9]
• Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14(2), 144-150. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01433]
• Lodge, M., & Wegrich, K. (2011). Governance as contested logics of control: Europeanized meat inspection regimes in Denmark and Germany. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(1), 90-105. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.520880]
• Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267]
• Lorenzoni, I., Jones, M., & Turnpenny, J. R. (2007). Climate change, human genetics, and post-normality in the UK. Futures, 39(1), 65-82. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.03.005]
• Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17(3-4), 445-459. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004]
• Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic change, 77(1-2), 73-95. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z]
• Lowe, T., Brown, K., Dessai, S., de França Doria, M., Haynes, K., & Vincent, K. (2006). Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 15(4), 435-457. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506063796]
• Maibach E. W., Leiserowitz A, Roser-Renouf C, & Mertz C. K. (2011). Identifying Like-Minded Audiences for Global Warming Public Engagement Campaigns: An Audience Segmentation Analysis and Tool Development. PLoS ONE 6(3): e17571. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017571]
• Marx, S. M., Weber, E. U., Orlove, B. S., Leiserowitz, A., Krantz, D. H., Roncoli, C., & Phillips, J. (2007). Communication and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Global Environmental Change, 17(1), 47-58. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.10.004]
• McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155-194. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x]
• McNeeley, S. M., & Lazrus, H. (2014). The cultural theory of risk for climate change adaptation. Weather, Climate, and Society, 6(4), 506-519. [https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00027.1]
• Meijer, A., Boon, W., & Moors, E. (2013). Stakeholder engagement in pharmaceutical regulation: connecting technical expertise and lay knowledge in risk monitoring. Public Administration, 91(3), 696-711. [https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12027]
• Meijnders, A. L., Midden, C. J., & Wilke, H. A. (2001). Role of negative emotion in communication about CO2 risks. Risk Analysis, 21(5), 955-955. [https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.215164]
• Milfont, T. L. (2012). Cultural differences in environmental engagement. In S. D. Clayton (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 181-200). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733026.013.0011]
• Milton, K. (1996), Environmentalism and Cultural Theory: Exploring the Role of Anthropology in Environmental Discourse. Routledge, New York.
• Myers, T. A., Nisbet, M. C., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2012). A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Climatic Change, 113(3-4), 1105-1112. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0513-6]
• Nauta, M. J., Fischer, A. R., Van Asselt, E. D., De Jong, A. E., Frewer, L. J., & De Jonge, R. (2008). Food safety in the domestic environment: the effect of consumer risk information on human disease risks. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 28(1), 179-192. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01012.x]
• Nelkin, D. (1995). Science controversies: the dynamics of public disputes in the United States. Handbook of science and technology studies, 444-456. [https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412990127.n19]
• Olson, M. (1965). The theory of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• O'Connor, R. E., Bord, R. J., & Fisher, A. (1998). How information about likely accomplishments affects willingness to sacrifice to reduce global warming. Journal of Risk Research, 1(3), 197-207. [https://doi.org/10.1080/136698798377123]
• O’Neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). ‘Fear won’t do it’: promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30, 355–379. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008329201]
• O’Riordan, T., & Jordan, A. (1999). Institutions, climate change and cultural theory: towards a common analytical framework. Global Environmental Change, 9(2), 81-93. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(98)00030-2]
• Palmer, C. G. (1996). Risk perception: An empirical study of the relationship between worldview and the risk construct. Risk Analysis, 16(5), 717-723. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb00820.x]
• Peters, E. M., Burraston, B., & Mertz, C. K. (2004). An emotion‐based model of risk perception and stigma susceptibility: Cognitive appraisals of emotion, affective reactivity, worldviews, and risk perceptions in the generation of technological stigma. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 24(5), 1349-1367. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00531.x]
• Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (1996). The Role of Affect and Worldviews as Orienting Dispositions in the Perception and Acceptance of Nuclear Power 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 26(16), 1427-1453. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00079.x]
• Pendergraft, C. A. (1998). ‘Human dimensions of climate change: Cultural theory and collective action’, Climate Change. 39, 643–666. [https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005323809980]
• Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2003). Public perceptions of risk, science and governance. Centre for Environmental Risk, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
• Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2003). Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 23(5), 961-972. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00373]
• Rayner, S. (1984). Radiation hazards in hospital: A cultural analysis of occupational risk perception. RAIN, (60), 10-12. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3033408]
• Rayner, S., & Cantor, R. (1987). How Fair Is Safe Enough? The Cultural Approach to Societal Technology Choice. Risk analysis, 7(1), 3-9. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1987.tb00963.x]
• Rippl, S. (2002). Cultural theory and risk perception: a proposal for a better measurement. Journal of Risk Research, 5(2), 147-165. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870110042598]
• Roberts, R. C. (2003). Emotions: An essay in aid of moral psychology. Cambridge University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610202]
• Roeser, S. (2007). Ethical intuitions about risks. Safety Science Monitor, 11(3), 1-13.
• Roeser, S. (2009). The relation between cognition and affect in moral judgments about risk. The Ethics of Technological Risks, 182–201.
• Roeser, S. (2010). Moral emotions and intuitions. Springer. [https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302457]
• Roeser, S. (2012). Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: A role for emotions. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(6), 1033-1040. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01812.x]
• Rogers, R. W. (1985). Attitude change and information integration in fear appeals. Psychological Reports, 56(1), 179-182. [https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1985.56.1.179]
• Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, research, application. New York: Oxford University Press
• Schwartz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, mis-attribution and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513]
• Shanahan, M., (2007). Talking about a revolution: Climate change and the media (IIED Briefing). London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
• Siemer, M., Mauss, I., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Same situation-different emotions: How appraisals shape our emotions. Emotion, 7(3), 592–600. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.592]
• Sheppard, S. R. (2005). Landscape visualisation and climate change: the potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environmental Science & Policy, 8(6), 637-654. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2005.08.002]
• Shi, J., Visschers, V. H., & Siegrist, M. (2015). Public perception of climate change: The importance of knowledge and cultural worldviews. Risk Analysis, 35(12), 2183-2201. [https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12406]
• Sjöberg, L. (1996). A discussion of the limitations of the psychometric and cultural theory approaches to risk perception. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 68(3-4), 219-225. [https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031868]
• Sjöberg, L. (2007). Emotions and risk perception. Risk management, 9(4), 223-237. [https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rm.8250038]
• Slovic, P. (1992). Perception of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In Krimsky, S & Golding, D (Eds.). Theories of Risk. (pp.215-228). New York: Praeger.
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311-322. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x]
• Slovic, P. and Peters, E. (1998). ‘The importance of worldviews in risk perception’, Risk Decision and Policy, 3, 165–170. [https://doi.org/10.1080/135753098348275]
• Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 322-325. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x]
• Smith, C. A., & Kirby, L. D. (2001). Toward delivering on the promise of appraisal theory. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Series in affective science. Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 121-138). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
• Smith, S. M., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Attitudes and recycling: does the measurement of affect enhance behavioral prediction?. Psychology & Marketing, 11(4), 359-374. [https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220110405]
• Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012). The rise of global warming skepticism: Exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(6), 1021-1032. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01801.x]
• Steg, L., & Sievers, I. (2000). Cultural theory and individual perceptions of environmental risks. Environment and Behavior, 32(2), 250-269. [https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972513]
• Stevenson, K. T., King, T. L., Selm, K. R., Peterson, M. N., & Monroe, M. C. (2018). Framing climate change communication to prompt individual and collective action among adolescents from agricultural communities. Environmental Education Research, 24(3), 365-377. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1318114]
• Sundblad, E. L., Biel, A., & Gärling, T. (2007). Cognitive and affective risk judgments related to climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 97–106. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.01.003]
• Swim, J. K., Stern, P. C., Doherty, T. J., Clayton, S., Reser, J. P., Weber, E. U., & Howard, G. S. (2011). Psychology's contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 241. [https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023220]
• Tansey, J. (2004). Risk as politics, culture as power. Journal of Risk Research, 7(1), 17-32. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987042000151188]
• Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2009). Transforming “apathy into movement”: The role of prosocial emotions in motivating action for social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 310-333. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309343290]
• Thompson M (1980). An Outline of the Cultural Theory of Risk. IIASA Working Paper. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria: WP-80-177.
• Thompson, M., Ellis, R. & Wildavsky, A. (1990) Cultural Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Townsend, E., Spence, A., & Knowles, S. (2013). Investigating the operation of the affect heuristic: Is it an associative construct? Journal of Risk Research, 17(3), 299–315. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2013.808687]
• Turner, M. M. (2007). Using emotion in risk communication: The anger activism model. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 114-119. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.013]
• Unsworth, K. L., & Fielding, K. S. (2014). It's political: How the salience of one's political identity changes climate change beliefs and policy support. Global Environmental Change, 27, 131-137. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.002]
• Van der Linden, S. (2015). The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 112-124. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.012]
• Weber, E. U. (2006). Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic change, 77(1-2), 103-120. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3]
• Weber, E. U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change?. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 332-342. [https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.41]
• Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 39(5), 806-820. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806]
• Whitmarsh, L. (2011). Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 690-700. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016]
• Wildavsky, A., & Dake, K. (1990). Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why?. Daedalus, 41-60.
• Witte, K. (1993). Message and conceptual confounds in fear appeals: The role of threat, fear, and efficacy. Southern Journal of Communication, 58(2), 147-155. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949309372896]
• Zagzebski, L. (2003). Emotion and moral judgment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66(1), 104-124. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00245.x]
• Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151-175. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151]
• Zhao, X., Leiserowitz, A. A., Maibach, E. W., & Roser-Renouf, C. (2011). Attention to science/environment news positively predicts and attention to political news negatively predicts global warming risk perceptions and policy support. Journal of Communication, 61(4), 713-731. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01563.x]