Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
The Korean Society for Journalism & Communication (KSJCS)
[ Journalism Communication ]
Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies - Vol. 64, No. 1, pp.49-90
ISSN: 2586-7369 (Online)
Print publication date 29 Feb 2020
Received 09 Aug 2019 Revised 11 Jan 2020 Accepted 31 Jan 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2020.64.1.002

공영방송 TV뉴스의 익명취재원 이용 : KBS <뉴스 9>와 BBC <10시뉴스>의 비교 분석

오해정* ; 김경모**
*이화여자대학교 커뮤니케이션·미디어학부 박사과정, MBC 기자 rosy217@naver.com
**연세대 언론홍보영상학부 교수 kkmo@yonsei.ac.kr
Anonymous Sources in Public Broadcasting News: A Comparative Analysis of KBS <News 9> and BBC <News at 10>
Hae Jung Oh* ; Kyungmo Kim**
*Doctoral Student, Division of Communication·Media, Ewha Womans University/Reporter, Munhwa Broadcasting Corporation rosy217@naver.com
**Professor, Department of Communication, Yonsei University, corresponding author kkmo@yonsei.ac.kr

초록

뉴스에서 취재원의 투명성과 적시는 기사의 품질 요건인 신뢰도, 사실성, 전문성 등과 직결된다. 이 연구는 KBS <뉴스 9>에 나타난 익명취재원 이용 실태를 영국 BBC <10시뉴스>와 비교함으로써 기존에 잘 이뤄지지 않았던 한국 방송뉴스의 익명취재원 이용 현황에 대해 유형화를 시도했다. 주 구성 표집에 따라 추출한 약 2주 분량의 기자 리포트 329건(KBS 253건, BBC 76건)을 내용 분석한 결과, KBS 뉴스의 익명취재원 이용은 분석대상의 30%(76건)에 달해 BBC 뉴스의 13.2%(10건)보다 훨씬 많은 것으로 나타났다. 두 방송사의 취재보도 가이드라인이 익명취재원 이용을 최소한으로 제한하는 비슷한 규정을 두고 있음에도 익명 보도 현실은 큰 차이를 드러냈다. 비교 분석을 통해 KBS는 일반 시민의 완전한 익명 처리가 빈번하고, 사회기사의 익명 취재 비중이 높으며, 취재원의 신원을 가리기 위해 모자이크와 음성변조를 혼용하는 편집기법을 자주 동원하는 특징이 관찰됐다. 특히 익명취재원의 기사 내 역할을 분석한 결과, KBS는 이해당사자의 입장을 반영하거나 현장성을 살리기 위해 익명취재원을 사용하는 특징이 상대적으로 두드러졌다. 이에 반해 BBC는 익명취재원을 사용한 보도 건수가 10건에 불과해 조직 차원에서 자사 가이드라인을 충실하게 준수한다는 사실을 유추할 수 있었다. 익명취재원 이용을 둘러싼 저널리즘 원칙의 실천이라는 맥락에서 두 방송사의 조직 문화와 취재 관행의 차이가 익명 보도의 질적 차이로 이어질 개연성을 논의했다.

Abstract

Transparency of a news source is directly related to reliability, realism, and professionalism, which are the requirements of quality journalism. The present study compared the use of anonymous sources in KBS <News 9> to BBC <News at 10> and eventually aimed to identify the pattern of using anonymous sources in Korean broadcasting news. According to an analysis of 329 reports (253 of KBS, 76 of BBC), the use of anonymous sources in KBS news reached 30 percent (76 cases) of all reports, which was far higher than 13.2 percent (10 cases) of BBC. The reality of anonymous coverage has shown a big difference, even though the two broadcasters' editorial guidelines had similar regulations that limited the use of anonymous sources to a minimum. KBS frequently used ordinary citizens as anonymous sources and had a high percentage of anonymously sourced reporting. Another characteristic of KBS anonymous-source reports was editing techniques such as image blurring and voice modulation. In particular, an analysis of the anonymous sources’ role in the reports revealed that KBS, unlike BBC, had the characteristic of using anonymous sources to reflect the interested parties or to increase the vividness of the reports. Also, it has been found out that the KBS guideline which allows reporters to include off-the-record information in the reports without mentioning the source, facilitated the excessive use of anonymous sources. Therefore, these characteristics should be reconsidered. From the analysis above, researchers concluded that KBS guidelines limiting the use of anonymous sources didn't function properly, and the misfunction may undermine the ethical virtues of journalism and the cedibility of news reports. Researchers assumed that such excessive use of anonymous sources has a close relation with chronic problems in Korean journalism, such as heavy reliance on government institutions and business, Korean-style news format, and the organizational culture which undervalues the use of transparent sources in reporting. On the other hand, only 10 BBC articles that used anonymous sources were found, so researchers assumed that BBC reporters faithfully followed its guidelines. In the context of implementing the principles of journalism surrounding the use of anonymous sources, researchers discussed what efforts should be supported to prevent the misuse of anonymous sources. Further practical implications are discussed.

Keywords:

News, Anonymous Source, Editorial Guideline, Reporting Routines, Content Analysis

키워드:

TV뉴스, 익명취재원, 취재보도 가이드라인, 취재 관행, 내용분석

References

  • Aalberg, T., Aelst, P., & Curran, J. (2010). Media systems and the political information environment: A cross-national approach. International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(3), 255-271. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210367422]
  • Bae, J. A. (2008). A study on the format trade in broadcasting industry. Broadcasting & Communication, 9(2), 6-36.
  • BBC (2020). Editorial guideline. Retrieved 01/17/20 from https://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines, /
  • Benoit, W. L., & Strathman, A. (2004). Source credibility and the elaboration likelihood model. In R. Glass & Seiter (Eds.), Readings in persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining (pp. 95-111). Boston: Pearson.
  • Blankenburg, W. B. (1992). The utility of anonymous attribution. Newspaper Research Journal, 13(1-2), 10-23. [https://doi.org/10.1177/073953299201300103]
  • Boeyink, E. (1990). Anonymous sources in news stories: Justifying exceptions and limiting abuses. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 5(4), 233-246. [https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327728jmme0504_2]
  • Burkhalter, S., Gastil, J., & Kelshaw, T. (2002). A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Communication Theory, 12, 398-422. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00276.x]
  • Chadha, K., & Koliska, M. (2015). Newsrooms and transparency in the digital age. Journalism Practice, 9(2), 215-229. [https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.924737]
  • Chancellor, J. W., & Mears, W. R. (1995). The new news business. New York: Harper & Row publishers.
  • Chung, S., Fink, E., & Kaplowitz, S. (2008). The comparative statics and dynamics of beliefs: The effect of message discrepancy and source credibility. Communication Monographs, 75(2), 158-189. [https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750802082060]
  • Corner, J. (1995). Television form and public address. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Dahlgren, P. (1995). Television and the public sphere. London: Sage.
  • Druckman, J. N. (2014). Pathologies of studying public opinion, political communication, and democratic responsiveness. Political Communication, 31, 467-492. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.852643]
  • Duffy, J. (2014). Anonymous sources: A historical review of the norms surrounding their use. American Journalism, 31(2), 236-261. [https://doi.org/10.1080/08821127.2014.905363]
  • Esposito, S. A. (1999). Anonymous white house sources: How they helped shape television news coverage of the Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky investigation. Communication and the Law, 21(3), 1.
  • Gladney, G. A., Shapiro, I., & Ray, R. (2013). Reasons for veiled sources spike after 2004 scandals. Newspaper Research Journal, 34(2), 36-49. [https://doi.org/10.1177/073953291303400204]
  • Hage, G. S., Dennis, E. E., Ismach, A. H., & Hartgen, S. (1976). New strategies for public affairs reporting. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Han, S. Y., & Youn, S. M. (2016). Competition and changes in Korean broadcast journalism: Examination of terrestrial broadcasting TV networks main news programs. Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, 30(1), 169-210.
  • Hong, Y. (2015). A study of anonymous sources : Focusing on the front-page stories of the Chosun Ilbo. Master dissertation, Ewha Womans University.
  • Im, Y.-H., & Lee, H.-J. (2001). Use of information sources in a Korean daily newspaper: A content analysis of Dongailbo, 1949-1999. Journal of Communication Science, 1(1), 300-330.
  • Jang, H., & Oh, S. (2001). A study on the use of sources of Korean and U.S. newspapers. A News Review, 7, 9-49.
  • Joe, D., & Yang, S. (2006). 42 percent of the sources remaining anonymous. News and Broadcasting, Feb, 8-18.
  • Karlsson, M. (2011). The immediacy of online news, the visibility of journalistic processes and a restructuring of journalistic authority. Journalism, 12(3), 279-295. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910388223]
  • KBS (2016). KBS editorial guideline. Seoul: KBS.
  • Kim, D. Y. (2016, July 1). Is a KBS report criticizing Ju Min Park, a member of the National Assembly, forged? Media Today. Retrieved 08/04/21 from http://www.mediatoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=130842
  • Kim, D. Y. (2020, March 28) Is a source of accusing the Minjoo Party's illegal party member recruitment forged? Media Today. Retrieved 08/04/21 from http://www.mediatoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=206150
  • Kim, K. (2003). Coverage routines of gender reproduction in television news and journalists' gender difference: A content analysis of the prime-time evening news in KBS, MBC, & SBS. Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, 17(3), 197-238.
  • Kim, O. (2004). Media ethics. Seoul: Communication Books.
  • Kim, W.-G. (2018). The survey about press credibility in Korea. Media Issue, 4(3), 1-12.
  • Kim, W.-G., Ahn, S.-C., & Baek, Y. M. (2018). Press credibility in Korea: Diagnosis and prescription. Seoul: Korea Press Foundation.
  • Kim, Y. (2006). Reliability is important: Expressions are specific. Newspaper & Broadcasting, 422, 28-31.
  • Koh, H., & Lee, G. (2010). An analysis of the sources of Korean newspapers' scientific reports: The Chosun Ilbo and Hankyoreh Shinmun for their scientific articles on U.S. beef imports. Social Science Research Conference, 24, 29-73.
  • Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2001). The elements of journalism. New York: Crown.
  • Lasorsa, D. L., & Reese S. D. (1990). News source use in the crash of 1987: A study of four national media. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 60-71. [https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909006700110]
  • Lasorsa, D. L. (2012). Transparency and other journalistic norms on twitter: The role of gender. Journalism Studies, 13(3), 402-417. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.657909]
  • Lasorsa, D. L., Lewis, S. C., & Holton, A. E. (2012). Normalizing twitter: Journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies, 13(1), 19-36. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2011.571825]
  • Lee, J. K., & Kim, J. M. (2000). A study on the practice of using sources of Korean newspaper articles. Korean Journalism Research, 2, 160-181.
  • Lee, J. K. (2004, July). Korean TV news format and reporting systems: Their characteristics and limitations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Korean Socite for Journalism and Communication Studies, Seoul.
  • Lee, Y.-H., & Cho, Y.-H. (2017). A study of perception of TV reporters about anonymous news sources: Focusing on the reporting practice, motivation, effect of the anonymous sources. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 61(5), 241-273.
  • Martin-Kratzer, R., & Thorson, E. (2007). Use of anonymous sources declines in US newspaper. Newspaper Research Journal, 28(2), 6-70. [https://doi.org/10.1177/073953290702800204]
  • McNair, B. (1998). The sociology of journalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Merrill, J. (1997). Journalism ethics: Philosophical foundations for news media. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Morton, L. (2015). Where are you coming from? Transparency and truth-claims in Dave Cullen’s Columbine. Journalism Practice, 9(2), 168-183. [https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.906931]
  • Nam, J. (2006). Current status and tasks of media ethics in Korea. Seoul: Korea Press Foundation.
  • Nielson Korea (2020). Top 20 list for TV programs. Retrieved 02/10/20 from http://www.nielsenmedia.co.kr/tv_terrestrial_day.asp?menu=Tit_1&sub_menu=1_1&area=01
  • Oh, H. J., & Choi, J. (2019). Effects of thematic and formal format of public broadcasting news on the depth of news. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 63(5), 152-189. [https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2019.63.5.005]
  • Park, D.-S., Cho, Y.-H., & Hong, J.-H. (2001). A qualitative study of news source-reporter relations: On the problems of beat reporting system. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 45, 367-396.
  • Park, J.-Y., & Lee, W. (2007). Quotation & attribution : A comparative study of Korean and U.S. newspapers. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 51(6), 439-468.
  • Park, J.-Y., & Lee, W. (2010). The development and application of the news evaluation index. Seoul: Korea Press Foundation.
  • Phillips, A. (2010). Transparency and the new ethics of journalism. Journalism Practice, 4(3), 373-382. [https://doi.org/10.1080/17512781003642972]
  • Price, V., & Neijens, P. (1997). Opinion quality in public opinion research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9, 336-360. [https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/9.4.336]
  • Purvis, H. (2015). Anonymous source: More or less and why and where? The Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 30(2), 2-21.
  • Rhee, J. W., & Hwang, Y. R. (2004). Thematic and formal characteristics of Korean broadcasting news: Finding the Korean broadcasting news scheme, Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, 18(3), 232-292.
  • Rhee, J. W., & Kim, K. (2008). Textual properties of desirable news: Fairness, validity, and sincerity. Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunications Research, 67, 9-44.
  • Ryfe, D. M. (2005). Does deliberative democracy work? Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 49-71. [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.032904.154633]
  • Sheehy, M. (2008). Foreign news stories more likely to include unnamed source. Newspaper Research Journal, 29(3), 24-37. [https://doi.org/10.1177/073953290802900303]
  • Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message in the 21st century. New York: Routledge.
  • Sigal, L. V. (1973). Reporters and officials: The organization and policies of news making. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heathe and Company.
  • Singer, J. B. (2007). Contested autonomy. Journalism Studies, 8(1), 79-95. [https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700601056866]
  • Song, S. (2016). A study of sourcing patterns in the news coverage of the Ferry Sewol Disaster. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 60(5), 34-62. [https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2016.60.5.002]
  • Spurk, C., Lopata, S., & Keel, G. (2010). Measuring the ‘democratic’ quality of radio news: Experiences from Liberia. Journal of African Media Studies, 2(2), 173-192. [https://doi.org/10.1386/jams.2.2.173_1]
  • Sternadori, M. M., & Thorson, E. (2009). Anonymous source harm credibility of all stories. Newspaper Research Journal, 30(4), 54-66. [https://doi.org/10.1177/073953290903000405]
  • Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
  • Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3-27. [https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551]
  • Wulfemeyer, K. (1985). How and why anonymous attribution is used by Time and Newsweek. Journalism Quarterly, 62(1), 81-126. [https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908506200112]
  • Wulfemeyer, K., & McFadden, L. (1986). Anonymous attribution in network news. Journalism Quarterly, 63(3), 468-473. [https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908606300303]
  • Yoon, S. (1999). Off the record and press reports. Kwanhun Journal, 71, 76-92.

Appendix

부록

  • 고흥석·이건호 (2010). 한국 신문의 과학 보도에 나타난 취재원 분석. <사회과학연구논총>, 24권, 29-73.
  • 김경모 (2003). 텔레비전 뉴스의 성 역학구도 재생산 보도관행과 저널리스트의 성차: KBS, MBC, SBS의 저녁종합뉴스 내용분석. <한국방송학보>, 17권 3호, 197-238.
  • 김도연 (2016, 7, 1). KBS ‘박주민 갑질’ 비난 보도, 취재원은 새누리 보좌관? <미디어오늘>. Retrieved 08/04/21 from http://www.mediatoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=130842
  • 김도연 (2020, 3, 28). 민주당 의혹 보도 KBS의 ‘전 당직자’ 알고 봤더니. <미디어오늘>. Retrieved 08/04/21 from http://www.mediatoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=206150
  • 김옥조 (2004). <미디어 윤리>. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스.
  • 김영욱 (2006). 신뢰성이 중요, 표현도 구체적이어야. <신문과 방송>, 422호, 28-31.
  • 김위근 (2018). 언론 신뢰도에 대한 시민 인식 조사. <미디어 이슈>, 4권 3호, 1-12.
  • 김위근·안수찬·백영민 (2018). <한국의 언론 신뢰도: 진단과 처방>. 서울: 한국언론진흥재단.
  • 남재일 (2006). <한국 언론윤리 현황과 과제>. 서울: 한국언론재단.
  • 닐슨 코리아 (2020). 지상파 일일 시청률. Retrieved 02/10/20 from http://www.nielsenmedia.co.kr/tv_terrestrial_day.asp?menu=Tit_1&sub_menu=1_1&area=01
  • 박동숙·조연하·홍주현(2001). 공적 업무 수행을 위한 사적 친분 고리: 출입처에서 취재원과 기자의 상호작용에 대한 질적 탐구. <한국언론학보>, 45권 특별호, 367-397.
  • 박재영·이완수 (2007). 인용과 취재원 적시에 대한 한미 신문 비교. <한국언론학보>, 51권 6호, 439-468.
  • 박재영·이완수 (2010). 뉴스평가지수의 개발과 적용. <한국언론진흥재단 지정주제 연구보고서>. 서울: 한국언론진흥재단.
  • 배진아 (2008). 방송시장의 포맷 거래에 관한 연구. <방송과 커뮤니케이션>, 9권 2호, 6-36.
  • 송상근 (2016). 취재원 사용의 원칙과 현실: 세월호 보도를 중심으로. <한국언론학보>, 60권 5호, 34-62.
  • 오해정·최지향 (2019). 한국 공영방송 TV 뉴스의 형식적, 내용적 도식에 따른 심층성 분석. <한국언론학보>, 63권 5호, 152-189.
  • 윤석홍 (1999). 오프 더 레코드와 언론보도. <관훈저널>, 71호, 76-92.
  • 이나연 (2018). 과학적 객관주의, 형식적 객관주의, 한국형 형식적 객관주의: 신문 기사에 사용된 취재원 사용과 직접 인용 분석을 중심으로. <한국언론학보>, 62권 2호, 112-142.
  • 이민웅·윤영철·최영재·윤태진·김경모·이준웅 (2006). <방송저널리즘과 공정성 위기>. 서울: 지식산업사.
  • 이윤희·조연하 (2017). TV뉴스의 익명 취재원 보도에 대한 방송기자의 인식 연구. <한국언론학보>, 61권 5호, 241-273.
  • 이재경·김진미 (2000). 한국 신문기사의 취재원 사용 관행 연구. <한국언론학연구>, 2호, 160-181.
  • 이재경 (2004, 7월). 한국 TV뉴스 양식과 취재 시스템: 그 특성과 한계. 한국언론학회 심포지움 및 세미나, 1-29.
  • 이준웅·김경모 (2008). 바람직한 뉴스의 구성조건. <방송통신연구>, 67호, 9-44.
  • 이준웅·황유리 (2004). 한국형 방송 뉴스 도식의 발견. <한국방송학보>, 18권 3호, 232-292.
  • 임영호·이현주 (2001). 신문기사에 나타난 정보원의 권력 분포: 1949-1999년 <동아일보> 기사의 내용분석. <언론과학연구>, 1권 1호, 300-330.
  • 장호순·오수정 (2001). 한미 신문의 취재원 이용 관행 연구. <보도비평>, 7호, 9-49.
  • 조동시·양승혜 (2006). 익명보도 많은 편 80.5%, 취재원의 42%가 익명. <신문과 방송>, 2월호, 8-18.
  • 좋은저널리즘연구회 (2018). <기사의 품질: 한국 일간지와 해외 유력지 비교연구>. 서울: 이화여대 출판문화원.
  • 한국방송 (2016). <KBS 방송제작 가이드라인>. 서울: KBS 한국방송.
  • 한수연·윤석민 (2016). 종합편성채널 출범이 지상파 방송 뉴스에 미친 영향. <한국방송학보>, 30권 1호, 169-210.
  • 홍연희 (2015). <한국 신문의 익명취재원 사용 관행 연구: 조선일보 1면을 중심으로>. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.