Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
The Korean Society for Journalism & Communication (KSJCS)
[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies - Vol. 64, No. 6, pp.202-237
ISSN: 2586-7369 (Online)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2020
Received 07 Aug 2020 Revised 30 Nov 2020 Accepted 02 Dec 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2020.64.6.006

우리는 어떤 로봇을 만들어가고 있는가? : 2010-2019 텔레비전 뉴스에 등장한 인공지능 로봇의 전달 방식과 특성에 관한 탐색적 연구

손승혜*
*세종대학교 미디어커뮤니케이션학과 교수 shsohn@sejong.ac.kr
Social Shaping of the Age of AI Robots: An exploratory analysis of the portrayal of AI robots on TV news from 2010-2019
Seunghye Sohn*
*Professor, Department of Media & Communication, Sejong University shsohn@sejong.ac.kr

초록

오랫동안 사람들이 상상해 왔던 로봇이 인공지능 기술을 바탕으로 실생활에 본격적으로 등장하기 시작했다. 이 연구는 새로운 기술이 한 사회에 도입, 확산되는데 인간의 선택이 기술의 형태와 발전 방향, 결과에 모두 영향을 미친다는 기술의 사회적 형성 이론을 기반으로 지난 10년간 텔레비전 뉴스에 등장한 로봇의 특성에 관해 실증적으로 분석했다. KBS, MBC, SBS, YTN에서 2010년부터 2019년까지 10년 동안 로봇을 소개한 뉴스 아이템 407건과 소개된 로봇 407개를 분석하였다. 텔레비전 뉴스는 정보원에 대한 의존도가 높고, 과학기술과 같이 흥미로운 영상을 제공하는 기사를 선호하며, 그 광범위하고 강력한 영향력으로 사회적인 판단과 결정에 영향을 미칠 수 있다고 판단되어 분석 대상으로 선정되었다. 기존 문헌 연구를 통해, 설정된 연구 문제는 다음과 같다: 1) 텔레비전 뉴스에 나타난 인공 지능 로봇 기사의 주제와 주요 등장인물은 누구인가?; 2) 텔레비전 뉴스에 나타난 로봇의 속성 중 외형적 특성, 역할과 목적, 강조된 능력은 무엇인가?; 3) 로봇에게 부여된 사회적 가치는 무엇인가?; 그리고 마지막으로 4) 기사의 제목에 사용된 어휘는 무엇이며, 이들은 어떻게 연결되어 있는가? 이러한 연구 문제에 대한 분석 결과, 알파고의 바둑대결과 4차 산업혁명 논의가 활발했던 2016년에 가장 높은 관심을 받았으며, 이들 기사에는 과학자와 사업자의 소개 외에 수혜자를 등장시켜 기술의 혜택을 강조했다. 등장하는 로봇들의 외형, 목적과 역할, 행동, 부여된 가치는 지난 10년간 상당한 변화를 보여주었다. 아직 낮은 수준의 자율성을 보이며 인간 보다는 기계의 외형을 갖고 있는 경우가 많았지만, 역할과 목적과 행동은 점차 현실적 활용성에 맞춰가고 있으며, 부여되는 가치도 기술적 정확성과 경제적 효율성이 강조되고 있다. 한편 기사의 제목 어휘 분석 결과는 점차 이 새로운 인공지능 로봇 기술이 현실 생활 속으로 들어오면서 미디어의 재현 방식도 변화하고 있음을 보여주고 있다. 실증자료를 기반으로 하는 이 연구의 결과는 본격적인 현실화 단계에 들어서고 있는 인공지능과 로봇에 대한 사회적 선택의 방향과 결과를 이해하고, 이를 통해 우리 사회가 새로운 기술에 어떤 가치를 부여해 가고 있는지 탐색하는 중요한 기본 정보를 제공하고 있다.

Abstract

Robots, after countless decades of human imagination, have started to appear in real life with the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI). Based on the theory of social shaping of technology, which states that the human choice affects all facets of a new technology’s introduction and expansion within a society, including its form, direction, and effect, this research conducts an empirical analysis of the characteristics of robots as they appeared on television news over the past ten years. The analysis consists of a review of 407 news items and 407 robots introduced between 2010 and 2019 in the news channels KBS, MBC, SBS, and YTN. Television news are chosen as the subject of this analysis not only because they exercise a significant impact on the evaluation and decision of the society and its members concerning technology, but also because of their heavy dependence on the sources of information who make major decisions on technological development and their preference for novel and eye-catching news stories such as robots. Based on the review of previous research, this study raises the following research questions: 1) What are the topics of the news coverage and along with the robots, who are the main figures appearing in the news?; 2) What are the characteristics of the robots, such as their appearances, roles and purposes, and behaviors as covered in the news?; 3) What are the social values attached to the robots? ; 4) What are the frequently used words on the titles of the news and their network forms? The research findings show that, over the past ten years, robots received the highest attention in 2016, the year of AlphaGo’s match and discussion surrounding Industry 4.0. News items placed not only the scientists and the businessmen, but also the evaluators and beneficiaries, at the forefront to emphasize the gains from the technology. In addition, the robots’ physical appearances, roles and purposes, behaviors, and attached values have significantly changed in the past ten years. Generally, robots still exhibit a low level of independence and machine-like appearance that is far from the human form. However, their purposes, roles, and behaviors are stepping towards realistic uses, and their attached values are focusing more on technological exactitude, delight/fun, and economic efficiency. A linguistic analysis of the news items also show that the media’s portrayal of AI robots have changed across time with the adoption of AI technology in the everyday life over the past decade. Through a holistic analysis based on empirical data, this research reviews the process of defining the social value of AI and robots as they enter their full-scale adoption stage and provides significant information on what values we attach to the technology.

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, robot, social shaping of technology, TV news

키워드:

인공지능, 로봇, 기술의 사회적 구성, TV뉴스

References

  • Ahn, Y. I. (2018. 06.22). Promised to ban development of ‘AI Killer Robot’... Strict surveillance required, SBS NEWS, http://news.sbs.co.kr/news/endPage.do?news_id=N1004815167&plink=ORI&cooper=NAVER
  • Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2012). News coverage of controversial emerging technologies: Evidence for the issue attention cycle in print and online media. Politics and the Life Sciences, 31(1-2). 87-96. [https://doi.org/10.2990/31_1-2_87]
  • Appel, M., Izydorczyk, D., Weber, S., Mara, M., & Lischetzke, T. (2020). The uncanny of mind in a machine: Humanoid robots as tools, agents, and experiencers. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 274-286. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.031]
  • Asimov, I. (1950). I, Robot. New York, NY: Gnome Press.
  • Bankins, S., & Formosa, P. (2020). When AI meets PC: Exploring the implications of workplace social robots and a human-robot psychological contract. European Journal of Work and organizational Psychology, 29(2), 215-229. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1620328]
  • Boczkowski, P., & Lievrouw, L. A. (2008). Bridging STS and communication studies_ scholarship on media and information technologies. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed., pp. 951–977). London, UK: The MIT Press.
  • Brennen, J. S., Howard, P. N., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). What to expect when you’re expecting robots: Futures, expectations, and pseudo-artificial general intelligence in U.K. news. Journalism, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920947535
  • Callons, M., & Law, J. (1982) On interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment. Social Studies of Science, 12(4), 615-625. [https://doi.org/10.1177/030631282012004006]
  • Choi, M. A. (2019). Revival of Pygmalion - Female robots in television drama <Borgmom> and <Roboti Aniya(It’s not a robot)>. The Journal of Korean Drama and Theatre, 63, 427-449. [https://doi.org/10.17938/tjkdat.2019..63.427]
  • Choi, S. W. (2020. 2). How does the Korean press report on artificial intelligence? Newspaper & Broadcasting, 590, 39-43.
  • Christensen, C. K. (2010). Young adults’ accounts of scientific knowledge when responding to a television news report of contested science. International Journal of Science Education, Part B. 1(2). 115-145. [https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2010.548658]
  • Collett, C., & Dillon, S. (2015). AI and gender: Four proposals for future research. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.
  • Cylines, M., & Kline, N. (1960). Cyborgs and space. Astronautics, 9, 26-27/74-76.
  • Dobrescu, E., & Dobrescu, E. M. (2017). The future of the artificial intelligence in economics and management. Review of General Management, 26(2). 81-9.
  • Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Stoll, B., Lin, X., & Massey, N. (2019). Evaluations of an artificial intelligence instructors’ voice: Social identity theory in human-robot interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 357-362. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.027]
  • Ellul, J. (1965). The technological society. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
  • Eom, W. S., Kim, Y. K., Lee, J. H., Choi, G. H., & Sim, E. S. (2013). Development trend of intelligent robots. Current Industrial and Technological Trends in Aerospace, 11(1), 150-160.
  • Gnambs, T., & Appel, M. (2019). Are robots becoming unpopular? Changes in attitudes towards autonomous robotic systems in Europe. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 53-61. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.045]
  • Hepp, A. (2020). Artificial companions, social bots and work bots: Communicative robots as research objects of media and communication studies. Media, Culture & Society, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720916412
  • Hur, S. (2005). The social shaping of information and communication technologies in Korea - Case study of development of national administrative information system. Korean Journal of Sociology, 39(1), 167-193.
  • Innis, H. (1950). Empire and communications. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
  • Jang, P. S., Jung, W. H., & Hyun, J. S. (2018). Analysis of differences in uncanny valley phenomenon by languages using social media data. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 37(2), 111-121.
  • Jin, Y. S., & Kwon, O. B. (2019). An empirical study on the effects of category and role of robot and human factors on the shape of uncanny valley. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 44(3), 540-553. [https://doi.org/10.7840/kics.2019.44.3.540]
  • Kim, C. S. (2008). A study on news frame of science and technology R&D outcome. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 10(2). 98-123.
  • Kim, K. S., & Ahn, C. K. (2018). Humanoid: Harmony between man and robot. The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers, 67(2), 7-13.
  • Kim, S. G., & Jo, J. D. (2017). Uncanny valley phenomenon analysis in communication with AI. The HCI Society of Korea Conference Proceedings, 1032-1034.
  • Kim, S. M. (2017). The politics of posthuman technology and subject formation - A study on media discourse on artificial intelligence technology. Media & Society, 25(2), 5-57.
  • Kim, Y. H. (2020). Farewell. Seoul: Milli’s Library
  • Lee, H. E. (2018). Why do voiceᐨactivated technologies sound female? : Sound technology and gendered voice of digital voice assistants. Korean Journal of Communication & Information, 90, 126-153. [https://doi.org/10.46407/kjci.2018.08.90.126]
  • Lee, S. S. (2017). Analysis of subject category on artificial intelligence discourse in newspaper articles. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48(4), 21-47 [https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.4.201712.21]
  • Lee, Y. H. (2013). Sociological studies on science and technology in Korea- A review and appraisal. Economy and Society, 100, 251-272.
  • Lim, J. S., Shin, M. J., Moon, H. B., Yoon, J. M., Jeong, T. Y., Lee, Y. J., & Yu, S. H. (2017). AI robot anthropomorphism study : A semantic network analysis of AlphaGo press coverage. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 61(4), 113-143. [https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2017.61.4.004]
  • Lim, Y. S. (2017). Knowledge-based social human-robot interaction. Ergonomics Society of Korea Conference, 33-74.
  • MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (1985). The social shaping of technology: How the refrigerator got its hum. Milton Keynes, U.K.: Open University Press.
  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The extentions of man. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Mori, M. (1970). The uncanny valley. Energy, 7, 33-35.
  • Oh, S. W. (2016). (ro)Bot as media - An experimental discussion on news chatbot. Korean Journal of Communication & Information, 79, 70-103.
  • Park, D. C. (2010). The effect of visual cues in TV environmental news on the viewers’ approval rating of 4 major-rivers project. Media and Performing Arts, 5(3), 61-88.
  • Park, J. H. (2018.04.05.) World bot scientists’ KAIST boycott due to controversy over killer robot, KBS News, http://news.kbs.co.kr/news/view.do?ncd=3630032&ref=A
  • Park, S. H. (2017). The relationship between human beings and digital beings - Embodied, non-possessive, and transindividual relationship. Korean Journal of Communication & Information, 86, 42-68. [https://doi.org/10.46407/kjci.2017.12.86.42]
  • Pickover, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence: An illustrated history: From medieval robots to neural networks. New York, NY: Sterling Publishing.
  • Pinch, T. R., & Bijker, W. E. (1984) The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-411. [https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004]
  • Robertson, J. (2010). Gendering humanoid robots: Robo-sexism in Japan. Body & Society, 16(2). 1-36. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X10364767]
  • Russell, B. (2017). Robots: The 500-year quest to make machines human. London, UK: Scala Arts & Heritage.
  • Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103-122. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x]
  • Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9-20, [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x]
  • Shin, H. S., & Jeon, C. H. (2018). When robots meet the elderly: The contexts of interaction and the role of mediators. Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 18(2), 135-179.
  • Shin, S. A., & Jeong, J. H. (2016). Taxonomies of artificial intelligence robot appeared in SF films. The HCI Society of Korea Conference Proceeding, 449-453. [https://doi.org/10.17210/hcik.2016.01.449]
  • Tannenbaum, P. (1953). The effect of headline on the interpretation of new stories. Journalism Quarterly, 37(3), 381-392. [https://doi.org/10.1177/107769905303000206]
  • Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York, NY: William Morrow.
  • Truitt, E. R. (2016). Medieval robots: Mechanism, magic, nature, and art. Philadelphia, PA: University of Penn Press. [https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812291407]
  • Western, D., Edwards, A. P., Edwards, C., Luo, Z., & Spence, P. R. (2020). I-It, I-Thou, I-Robot: The perceived humanness of AI in human-machine communication. Communication Studies, 71(3), 393-408. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1749683]
  • Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, 25, 856-899. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(96)00885-2]
  • You, E. S., & Cho, M. R. (2018). The ethics of robots and humans in the post-human age. Journal of The Korea Contents Association. 18(3), 592-600.
  • Zheng, L., & Pan, Y. H. (2017). Classification of robot act in human-robot interaction-focused on service robot. KSDS Conference Proceeding, 62-63.

Appendix

부록

  • 김관수·안춘기 (2018). 휴머노이드: 인간과 로봇의 조화. <전기의 세계>, 67권 2호, 7-13.
  • 김서광·조준동 (2017). AI와의 커뮤니케이션에서 언캐니 밸리 현상 분석. <한국 HCI 학회 학술대회 발표논문집>, 1032-1034.
  • 김수미 (2017). 포스트휴먼 기술 담론과 포스트휴먼 주체 구성의 정치성에 대한 탐구: 인공지능 기술에 관한 담론 분석을 중심으로. <언론과 사회>, 25권 2호, 5-57.
  • 김영하 (2020). <작별 인사>. 서울: 밀리의 서재.
  • 김찬석 (2008). 과학기술 연구 성과의 뉴스 프레임 연구. <한국광고홍보학회>, 10권 2호. 98-123.
  • 박덕춘 (2010). 텔레비전 뉴스의 시각적 요소가 수용자의 인식에 미치는 영향. <미디어와 공연예술>, 5권 3호. 61-88.
  • 박선희 (2017). 인간과 디지털 존재의 관계: 관계의 물질성, 비소유성, 개체초월성. <한국언론정보학보>, 86권, 42-68.
  • 박장훈 (2018, 04, 05). 세계 로봇학자들 ‘킬러 로봇’ 우려 KAIST 보이콧 논란. <KBS 뉴스>, http://news.kbs.co.kr/news/view.do?ncd=3630032&ref=A
  • 신선아·정지훈 (2016). SF 영화에 등장하는 인공지능 로봇의 분류체계. <한국HCI학회 학술대회 발표논문집>, 449-453.
  • 신희선·전치형 (2018). 노인과 로봇은 어떻게 만나는가: 상호작용의 조건과 매개자의 역할. <과학기술학연구>, 18권 2호, 135-179.
  • 안영인 (2018, 06, 22). ‘AI 킬러로봇’ 개발 금지 약속했지만…엄격한 감시 필요. <SBS 뉴스>, http://news.sbs.co.kr/news/endPage.do?news_id=N1004815167&plink=ORI&cooper=NAVER
  • 엄위섭·김연규·이주희·최기혁·심은섭 (2013). 지능형 로봇의 발전 동향. <항공우주산업기술동향>, 11권 1호, 150-160.
  • 오세욱 (2016). 미디어로서의 봇(bot): 뉴스 챗봇에 대한 시론적 논의. <한국언론정보학보>, 79권, 70-103.
  • 유은순·조미라 (2018). 포스트휴먼 시대의 로봇과 인간의 윤리. <한국콘텐츠학회논문지>, 18권 3호, 592-600.
  • 이수상 (2017). 신문기사에 나타난 인공지능 담론에 대한 주제범주 분석. <한국도서관정보학회지>, 48권 4호, 21-47.
  • 이영희 (2013). 한국 과학기술사회학 연구의 동향과 과제. <경제와 사회>, 100권, 251-272.
  • 이희은 (2018). AI는 왜 여성의 목소리인가?-음성인식장치 테크놀로지와 젠더화된 목소리. <한국언론정보학보>, 90권, 126-153.
  • 임윤섭 (2017). 지식 기반 사회적인 인간-로봇 상호작용. <대한인간공학회 학술대회 논문집>, 33-74.
  • 임종수·신민주·문훈복·윤주비·정태영·이연주·유승현 (2017). AI 로봇 의인화 연구: 알파고 보도의 의미네트워크 분석. <한국언론학보>, 61권 4호, 113-143.
  • 장필식·정우현·현주석 (2018). Social Media Data를 이용한 Uncanny Valley 현상의 언어권 별 차이 분석. <대한인간공학회지>, 37권 2호, 111-121.
  • 정령·반영환 (2017). 인간-로봇 상호작용에서의 로봇 행동 분류 서비스 로봇을 중심으로. <한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집>, 62-63.
  • 진윤선·권오병 (2019). 로봇의 범주, 역할 및 사용자 특성이 Uncanny Valley의 형태에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증 연구. <한국통신학회 논문지>, 44권 3호, 540-553.
  • 최민아 (2019). 피그말리온의 재현: 텔레비전 드라마 보그맘과 로봇이 아니야 속 여자 로봇. <한국극예술연구>, 63권, 427-449.
  • 최순욱 (2020. 2). 한국언론은 인공지능을 어떻게 보도하는가. <신문과 방송>, 590권, 39-43.
  • 허상수 (2005). 한국 정보통신기술의 사회적 형성. <한국사회학>, 39권 1호, 167-193.