Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
The Korean Society for Journalism & Communication Studies (KSJCS)
[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies - Vol. 66, No. 4, pp.39-71
ISSN: 2586-7369 (Online)
Print publication date 31 Aug 2022
Received 11 Feb 2022 Revised 25 Jul 2022 Accepted 01 Aug 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2022.66.4.002

OTT 시대 공영방송의 책무와 재원구조에 대한 전문가 인식 연구

신삼수** ; 김동준*** ; 봉미선****
**한국교육방송공사 수석 samsooshin@gmail.com
***공공미디어연구소 소장 jun6067@hanmail.net
****한국교육방송공사 전문위원 misun51@gmail.com
Analysis of Experts' Perception of the Objectives and Desirable Funding Models of Public Broadcasting in the OTT Era
Samsoo Shin** ; Dongjun Kim*** ; Misun Bong****
**General Manager, EBS, first author samsooshin@gmail.com
***Director, Research Institute for Public Media jun6067@hanmail.net
****Researcher, EBS, corresponding author misun51@gmail.com

초록

미디어 환경변화에 따라 공영방송의 책무는 다르게 규정되고, 책무를 수행하는 재원형태와 재원구조 또한 달라진다. 공영방송 역할이 무엇인가, 어느 정도 규모인지에 따라, 목적을 수행하기 위한 자금의 형태와 규모도 달라지기 때문이다. 본 연구는 국내 미디어커뮤니케이션 전문가를 대상으로 공영방송이 수행해야 할 책무와 바람직한 재원 충당 모델에 대한 인식을 조사, 분석하였다(N = 80). 구조화된 설문지를 작성하여 온라인 설문조사를 실시하였다. 다음과 같은 주요 연구 결과를 도출하였다. 첫째, 미디어 전문가들이 가장 많이 선택한 공영방송의 첫 번째 책무는 민주주의 발전에 기여하는 것이었다. 뒤를 이어 공론장으로 기능하며, 정확한 정보를 제공하는 것을 우선시하였다. 중요한 3가지를 다중 선택한 결과에서는 공영방송의 보편적 서비스가 가장 많은 선택을 받았다. 둘째, 전문가 그룹은 공영방송의 대표적인 재원 조달 형태 5가지(TV수신료, 방송광고, 광고 외 방송사업, 방송 외 기타사업, 정부지원금) 가운데 TV수신료를 공영방송의 가장 바람직한 재정 모델로 간주했다. 그들은 방송광고나 자체 수익사업과 같은 상업적 활동을 통한 공영방송의 자금조달지원에 대해서는 덜 바람직하다고 인식하고 있었다. 셋째, 전문가들은 국내 공영방송 KBS와 EBS의 전체 예산에서 TV수신료가 차지하는 비중을 매우 낮은 수준으로 인식하고 있었다. 대한민국 공영방송 KBS와 EBS의 전체 예산 가운데 TV수신료가 차지하는 비율은 70 - 79% 수준이 적정하다고 응답한 전문가들이 가장 많았다. 이번 연구는 미디어 플랫폼 발전과 수용자들의 방송이용행태가 변화한 OTT시대를 맞이하여, 공영방송이 우선해야 할 책무와 적절한 재원 충당 모델에 관한 전문가들의 인식을 실제로 조사, 분석한 데 의의가 있다. 본 연구 결과는 OTT시대를 맞이하여 공영방송이 지향해야 할 책무와 공영방송의 바람직한 자금 조달 형태를 새롭게 설정할 필요가 있음을 시사한다.

Abstract

As the media environment changes, the objectives of public broadcasting also change. The objectives of public broadcasting vary depending on the context and the country. Recently, as the use of over the top (OTT) global streaming has been increasing, broadcast audiences have become divided. Consequently, the crisis of public broadcasting is escalating. Therefore, We argue that the objectives of public broadcasting in the OTT era should differ from those of the past. In this situation, determining the purpose that domestic public broadcasters should aim for is a crucial research topic. Within the OTT-era context, debates are also occurring on the method and form of financing public broadcasting, focusing on TV license fees. Debates on the purpose and funding models of public broadcasting tend to be closely related because the form and size of funds to achieve its purpose vary depending on the type and extent of the role of public broadcasting. In this study, how experts perceived the objectives of public broadcasting in the OTT era and whether the funding models for the Korean public broadcasters KBS and EBS were desirable were investigated and analyzed by surveying the experts (N = 80) online by through a structured questionnaire. Experts who participated in the survey were university professors or researchers with doctoral degrees who had conducted research on public broadcasting and television license fees. This study revealed the following results. First, the media experts’ most frequently chosen response was that the primary purpose of public broadcasting was to contribute to the development of democracy, followed by providing the public discussion sphere and accurate information. In three multiple choice survey questions, the universal service of public broadcasting was chosen the most. Second, the expert group considered the TV license fees as the most desirable funding source of public broadcasting among the five funding sources (TV license fees, broadcast advertisements, non-advertising broadcasting and non-broadcasting business, and government subsidies). They recognized that funding for public broadcasting through commercial activities such as broadcasting advertisements and commercial businesses was less desirable. Third, experts recognized that the proportion of TV license fees in the total budget of domestic public broadcasting services KBS and EBS were at extremely low levels. Among the total budgets of KBS and EBS experts said that 70–79% of TV license fees were appropriate. This study is significant for its focus on investigating and analyzing experts' perceptions of the purpose and desirable funding models of public broadcasting, which should take precedence in the era of media platform development and broadcasting behavior change. The results of this study suggest that the objectives and desirable funding models of public broadcasting must be newly established in the OTT era.

Keywords:

Public Broadcasting, Objective of Public Broadcasting, Funding Model of Public Broadcasting, TV License Fee, Public Service Media

키워드:

공영방송, 공영방송 책무, 공영방송 재원, TV수신료, 재원구조

Acknowledgments

This work has been reanalyzed, revised, and supplemented based on the research project data of the Korea Educational Broadcasting System in 2021, 본 논문은 공동저자가 책임연구원으로 참여한 2021년 한국교육방송공사의 연구과제 데이터를 활용하였음.

References

  • Banerjee, I. (Ed.). (2005). Public service broadcasting: A best practices sourcebook. New York, NY: UNESCO.
  • Bang, J. B. (2012). Legal status and tasks of broadcasting license fee calculation organization: Focusing on Germany’s KEF 3-Phase Model. Unpublished paper.
  • Bang, J. B., & Kim, J. C. (2006). A study on the perception of public values and roles of public broadcasting in the digital era: Focusing on a group of experts. Korean Broadcasting Journal, 20(1), 96-138.
  • Bardoel, J., & Lowe, G. F. (2007). From public service broadcasting to public service media: The core challenge. In G. F. Lowe & J. Bardoel (Eds.), From public service broadcasting to public service media (pp. 9-26). Gothenburg, Sweden: Nordicom.
  • BBC. (2020). BBC group annual report and accounts 2018/2019.
  • Blumler, J., & Gurevitch, M. (2001). The crisis of public communication. Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181775]
  • Blumler, J. G., & Hoffmann‐Riem, W. (1992). New roles for public television in Western Europe: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Communication, 42(1), 20-35. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00766.x]
  • Blumler, J. G., & Nossiter, T. J. (Eds.). (1991). Broadcasting finance in transition: A comparative handbook. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Bong, M. S., & Shin, S. S. (2019). Review of legislative tasks to improve the procedure for determining license fees for public broadcasting TV: Focusing on the establishment of the TV license fee committee. Legislation and Policy Studies, 11(3), 333-362.
  • Booth, P. (2020). The future of public service broadcasting and the funding and ownership of the BBC. Economic Affairs, 40(3), 324-343. [https://doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.12419]
  • Born, G. (2003). From Reithian ethic to managerial discourse accountability and audit at the BBC. Javnost-The Public, 10(3), 63-80. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2003.11008835]
  • Broadcasting Research Unit. (1986). The public service idea in British broadcasting: Main principles.
  • Burri, M. (2015). Public service broadcasting 3.0: Legal design for the digital present. Hoboken, NJ: Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315767888]
  • Cho, H. J. (2009). The theory and history of Korean broadcasting. Seoul: Nonhyeong.
  • Cho, H. J. (2014). Identity of Korean public broadcasting. Seoul: Culture Look.
  • Choi, S. K. (2015). A study on the validity of raising license fees for public broadcasting in Korea: Focusing on financial soundness and viewer welfare. Journal of Research on Broadcast Culture, 27(3), 159-193.
  • Choi, Y. M. (2010). A review of the license fee for Korean public broadcasting and TV. Journal of Social Science Research, 23(1), 151-181.
  • Chung, J. H. (2015). Public broadcasting and license fees, and gaps: From a future perspective of public media services. Journal of Media and education, 5(1), 7-13.
  • Chung, Y. J. (2006). Universal service and audience welfare. Journal of Broadcasting and Communication Research, 63, 31-58.
  • Collins, R. (2007). The BBC and public value. Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 55(2), 164-184. [https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2007-2-164]
  • Council of Europe. (2007). Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)3 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the remit of public service media in the information society.
  • Croteau, D., & Hoynes, W. (2006). The business of media: Corporate media and the public interest. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
  • Croteau, D., & Hoynes, W. (2018). Media/Society: Technology, industries, content, and users. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Cunningham, S. (2015). Repositioning the innovation rationale for public service media. International Journal of Digital Television, 6(2), 203–220. [https://doi.org/10.1386/jdtv.6.2.203_1]
  • Dahlgren, P. (1995). Television and the public sphere: Citizenship, democracy and the media. London, UK: Sage.
  • Davis, G., Black, H., Budd, A., Evans, R., Gordon, J., Lipsey, D., ... & Newton, T. (1999). The future funding of the BBC. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport. (2016). Charter and agreement - About the BBC.
  • Debrett, M. (2009). Riding the wave: Public service television in the multi-platform era. Media, Culture & Society, 31(5), 807-827. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709339466]
  • Donders, K. (2019). Public service media beyond the digital hype: Distribution strategies in a platform era. Media, Culture & Society, 41(7), 1011-1028. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719857616]
  • European Broadcasting Union. (2012). Empowering society: A declaration on the core values of public service media.
  • Elstein, D. (2001, May 15). The BBC no longer washes whiter. Open Democracy. Retrieved from https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/article_53jsp, /
  • Entman, R. M., & Wildman, S. S. (1992). Reconciling economic and non-economic perspectives on media policy: Transcending the “marketplace of ideas”. Journal of Communication, 42(1), 5-19. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00765.x]
  • France Televisions. (2020). Rapport annuel - Volet financier 2019.
  • Graham, A. (2001). Quality not profit. Open Democracy. Retrieved from https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/article_57jsp, /
  • Graham, A., & Davies, G. (1992). The public funding of broadcasting. In T. Congdon et al. (Eds.), Paying for broadcasting: The handbook (pp. 167-221). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger & F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity. (Original work published 1962).
  • Han, D. S. (2005, April). Expert perception survey on Public broadcasting system. Paper presented at the Korean Association for Communication and Information Studies Seminar 2005, 27-41.
  • House of Lords. (2022). Licence to change: BBC future funding.
  • Hwang, K. (2012). A study on improvements plans of license fee policy in the public broadcasting system. Gyeonggi: Korea Communications Commission.
  • Jang, I. H., & Ji, S. W. (2013). A study on the improvement of the financial structure of public broadcasting to cope with changes in the broadcasting market. Journal of the Law Discussion, 20(3), 189-222.
  • Jung, Y. W. (2010). A review on the justification of identity and rise in receiving fee of public broadcasting. Broadcasting & Communication Study, 70, 60-86.
  • Jung, Y. J. (2006). A study of the universal service and audience welfare in the convergence era. Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunications Research. 63, 31-58.
  • Jung, Y. J. (2015). A historical review of BBC’s public sphere model. Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunications Research, 91, 165-184.
  • Kang, H. C. (2004). Public service broadcasting. Gyeonggi: Nanam Publishing.
  • Kang, H. C. (2009). Viewers’ perception of the value of public broadcasting. Legislation and Policy, 1, 183-207.
  • Kang, H. C., Oh, H. Y., Kim, H. J., & Bae, J. K. (2008). The development and implications of the concurrent public broadcasting fund theory. Media Information Research, 45(2), 69-101. [https://doi.org/10.22174/jcr.2008.45.2.69]
  • Kang, H. C., Shim, M. S., & Oh, H. Y. (2011). Value of public service broadcasting and its performance viewer and production crew survey. Journal of Research on Broadcast Culture, 25(1), 7-45.
  • Kang, M. H. (2012). Financial resources for public broadcasting. In M. S. Na, Y. J. Jung, H. J. Cho, & J. A. Bae (Eds.), Understanding of public broadcasting (pp. 367-406). Gyeonggi: Han-ul.
  • Kang, M. H. (2017). Institutional improvement tasks for rationalizing the financial structure of the broadcasting market. Broadcast Culture, 411, 43-60.
  • KBS. (2022). KBS website. Retrieved 2/22/22 from https://office.kbs.co.kr/susin/archives/3894
  • Kim, D. H. (1995). The change of philosophy of public broadcasting in the UK: Focusing on the report of the broadcasting research committee. Journal of the Media and Society, 7, 98-129.
  • Kim, D. K. (2010, August). Reorganization of public broadcasting funds and responsibilities: Focusing on discussions on realizing license fees. Paper of the presentation for the seminar of the Korean Broadcasting Association.
  • Kim, J. S. (2010). Criticism of the KBS license fee increase plan. The Collection of Laws, 15(2), 123-152.
  • Kim, J. Y. (2007). Desirable appearance of public broadcasting and the problem of financing public broadcasting. Paper presented at the policy meeting of the Barun Social Citizens’ Association.
  • Kim, S. S. (2002). Re-examining broadcast license fee. Korean Journal of Broadcasting & Telecommunication Studies, 16(3), 45-74.
  • Kim, S. S. (2013). Rethinking the policy of television license fee. Journal of Research on Broadcast Culture, 25(1), 109-134.
  • Koboldt, C., Hogg, S., & Robinson, B. (1999). The implications of funding for broadcasting output. In A. Graham, C. Koboldt, & S. Hogg (Eds.), Public purposes in broadcasting: Funding the BBC (pp. 47-72). Luton, UK: University of Luton Press.
  • Koh, M. S. (2015). A constitutional legitimacy of television broadcast receipt fee. Public Law Journal, 16(2), 105-128. [https://doi.org/10.31779/plj.16.2.201505.005]
  • Korea Communications Commission. (2012). A white paper approved by the PP and total genre broadcasting channel.
  • Kuttner, R. (1999). Everything for sale: The virtues and limits of markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kwon, H. Y. (2004). Comparative study on the composition of revenue in the public service broadcaster and the license fees. Journal of Research on Broadcast Culture, 16(1), 149-176.
  • Lee, B. S. (2005). A plan to secure reasonable financial resources for public broadcasting in the era of convergence of broadcasting and communication. Seminar and Report of the Korean Broadcasting Society, 3, 7-54.
  • Lee, C. K. (2012). Theoretical review of the concept of public value of public broadcasting. Paper presented at the academic conference of the Korean Press Association, 173-173.
  • Lee, J. K. (2015, February 26). The socioeconomic significance of financial stabilization of public broadcasting. Paper presented at the seminar of the Korean Press Association, 19-38.
  • Lee, J. K., & Shim, Y. S. (2013). A study on the improvement of laws and systems related to the financial structure of public broadcasting. Gyeonggi: Korea Communications Commission.
  • Lee, M. K. (1999). Analysis of reasonable license fee levels. Broadcasting Research, Summer, 129-156.
  • Lee, M. W., Lee, C. K., Choi, Y. J., & Hong, S. K. (2008). Research on how to secure the publicity of digital media transition period and overseas public broadcasting. Gyeonggi: Korea Communications Commission.
  • Lim, H. S. (2010). A study on the change in KBS’ financial resources according to the timing and factors. Journal of Korea Advertising and Public Relations Studies, 12(1), 319-355.
  • Lowe, G. F., & Martin, F. (2014). The value of public service media: RIPE@ 2013. Gothenburg, Sweden: Nordicom.
  • McKinsey. (1999). Public service broadcasters around the world: A McKinsey report for the BBC.
  • McNair, B. (2011). An introduction to political communication. London, UK: Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203828694]
  • Media Civil Reform Network. (2020). Media policy report to strengthen citizens’ communication rights.
  • Mills, T. (2016). The BBC: Myth of a public service. London, UK: Verso.
  • Murdock, G. (1992). Citizens, consumers and public culture. In M. Skovmand & K. Schroder (Eds.), Media cultures. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Murdock, G. (2005). Building the digital commons. In P. Jauert & G. F. Lowe (Eds.), Cultural dilemmas in public service broadcasting (pp. 213-231). Gothenburg, Sweden: Nordicom.
  • NHK. (2020). NHK Corporate Profile 2021-2022.
  • Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Reuters institute digital news report 2020. Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
  • Nieminen, H. (2019). Inequality, social trust and the media. In J. Trappel (Ed.), Digital media inequalities (pp. 43-56). Gothenburg, Sweden: Nordicom.
  • Nissen, C. S. (2006). Public service media in the information society. Report prepared for the Council of Europe’s Group of Specialists on Public Service Broadcasting in the Information Society (MC-S-PSB).
  • Noh, C. H., Sung, J. Y., Chun, J. H., & Lee, S. Y. (2017). A study to prepare a plan to change the financial structure of public broadcasting according to changes in the media environment. Gyeonggi: Korea Communications Commission.
  • Noh, K. Y. (2010). The financial structure and license fee system of public broadcasting. Journal of Broadcasting and Communication Research, 70, 9-35.
  • Ofcom. (2004). Ofcom review of public service television broadcasting: Phase 1- Is television special?
  • Ofcom. (2021). Small screen, big debate: Recommendations to government on the future of public service media.
  • Oh, H. I., Hong, J. Y., & Chung, Y. J. (2021). Resets the management status and responsibilities of public broadcaster KBS: Beyond the discourse on normalizing license fees and the discourse on lazy management. Broadcasting and Communication Research, 113, 53-92.
  • Oh, H. Y., & Kang, H. C. (2015). The type of viewers according to the recognition of public value, the attitude toward the public broadcasting system. Journal of Korean Association for Communication and Information Studies, 69(1), 139-169.
  • Padovani, C., & Tracey, M. (2003). Report on the conditions of public service broadcasting. Television & New Media, 4(2), 131-153. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476402250677]
  • Park, J. W., & Kim, K. H. (2017). A study on the constituent factors of Korean PSB governance and the expert recognition on PSB crisis. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 18(5), 839-847.
  • Peacock, A. T. (1986). Report of the Committee on Financing the BBC, 9824. HM Stationery Office.
  • Peacock, S. A. (2000). Market failure and government failure in broadcasting. Economic Affairs, 20(4), 2-6. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0270.00249]
  • Picard, R. (2001). Audience economics of European Union public service broadcasters. Turku, Finland: Turku School of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Raboy, M. (Ed.). (1996). Public broadcasting for the 21st century. Luton, UK: University of Luton Press.
  • Richeri, G. (2011). The media amid enterprises, the public, and the state. The handbook of political economy of communications, 129-139. [https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444395402.ch6]
  • Rowland, W. D. jr., & Tracey, M. (1990). Worldwide challenges to public service broadcasting. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 8-27. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02259.x]
  • Shin, S. S., & Bong, M. S. (2019). A Meta-analysis of the study of public broadcasting TV license fees. Political Communication Research, 54, 101-151.
  • Select Committee on Communications and Digital. (2019). Public service broadcasting: As vital as ever. London, UK: House of Lords.
  • Tambini, D. (2004). The passing of paternalism: Public service television and increasing channel choice. In J. Cowling & D. Tambini (Eds.), From public service broadcasting to public service communications, 46-60. Institute for Public Policy Research.
  • Tunez-Lopez, M., Campos-Freire, F., & Rodriguez-Castro, M. (2021). The values of public service media in the Internet society. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56466-7]
  • Weeds, H. (2016). Is the television licence fee fit for purpose in the digital era?. Economic Affairs, 36(1), 2-20. [https://doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.12166]
  • Yoon, S. M. (2006). Communication policy studies. Seoul: CommunicationBooks.

Appendix

부록

  • 강명현 (2012). 공영방송의 재원. 나미수·정용준·조항제·배진아 (편), <공영방송의 이해> (367-406쪽). 경기: 한울.
  • 강명현 (2017). 방송시장 재원구조 합리화를 위한 제도적 개선과제. <방송문화>, 411호, 43-60.
  • 강형철 (2004). 공영방송론. 경기: 나남출판.
  • 강형철 (2009). 공영방송 가치에 대한 시청자 인식. <입법과 정책>, 1권 1호, 183-207.
  • 강형철·심미선·오하영 (2011). 공영방송의 공적가치와 수행평가; 수용자와 제작진 인식 비교. <한국방송학보>, 25권 1호, 7-45.
  • 강형철·오하영·김효진·배정근 (2008). 경합형 공공방송기금론의 전개와 함의. <언론정보연구>, 45권 2호, 69-101.
  • 고민수 (2015). 현행 수신료제도의 헌법적 정당성 및 제도적 타당성에 관한 연구. <공법학연구>, 16권 2호, 105-128.
  • 권호영 (2004). 공영방송의 수입구성과 수신료 수준의 비교분석. <방송연구>, 16권 1호, 151-176.
  • 김대호 (1995). 영국 공영방송 이념의 변화: 방송연구위원회 보고서를 중심으로. <언론과 사회>, 7호, 98-129.
  • 김동규 (2010, 8월). <공영방송의 재원과 책무의 재구성: 수신료 현실화 논의를 중심으로>. 한국방송학회 세미나 발제문.
  • 김승수 (2002). 방송수신료의 이론적 검토와 개선방안. <한국방송학보>, 16권 3호, 45-74.
  • 김승수 (2013). 방송수신료 제도의 개혁에 관한 연구. <방송문화연구>, 25권 1호, 109-134.
  • 김종서 (2010). KBS 수신료 인상안 비판. <법학논집>, 15권 2호, 123-152.
  • 김진영 (2007). <바람직한 공영방송의 모습과 공영방송 재원조달 문제>, 바른사회시민회의 정책간담회 발표자료.
  • 노기영 (2010). 공영방송의 재원구조와 수신료 제도. <방송통신연구>, 70호, 9-35.
  • 노창희·성지연·전주혜·이수연 (2017). <미디어환경 변화에 따른 공영방송 재원구조 변화 방안 마련을 위한 연구>. 경기: 방송통신위원회.
  • 미디어개혁시민네트워크 (2020). <시민의 커뮤니케이션 권리 강화를 위한 미디어 정책 보고서>.
  • 박종원·김광호 (2017). 한국 공영방송의 거버넌스 구성요인과 공영방송 위기에 대한 전문가 인식 조사 연구. <한국디지털콘텐츠학회 논문지>, 18권 5호, 839-847.
  • 방송통신위원회 (2012). <종합편성･보도전문PP 승인 백서>.
  • 방정배 (2012). 방송수신료 산정기구의 법제적 위상과 과제: 독일의 KEF 3단계 모델을 중심으로. 미발행 논문.
  • 방정배·김재철 (2006). 디지털 시대 공영방송의 공적 가치와 역할에 관한 인식 연구: 전문가 집단을 중심으로. <한국방송학보>, 20권 1호, 96-138.
  • 봉미선·신삼수 (2019). 공영방송 TV 수신료 결정 절차 개선을 위한 입법과제 고찰:‘수신료위원회’설치를 중심으로. <입법과 정책>, 11권 3호, 333-362.
  • 신삼수·봉미선 (2019). 공영방송 TV 수신료 연구에 대한 메타분석. <정치커뮤니케이션연구>, 54호, 101-151.
  • 오하영·강형철 (2015). 공적가치 인식에 따른 시청자 유형과 공영방송 제도 및 수신료에 대한 태도. <한국언론정보학보>, 69권 1호, 139-169.
  • 오형일·홍종윤·정영주 (2021). 공영방송 KBS의 경영 현황과 책무 재설정: 수신료 정상화 담론과 방만 경영 담론을 넘어. <방송통신연구>, 113호, 53-92.
  • 윤석민 (2006). <커뮤니케이션 정책 연구>. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스.
  • 이명곤 (1999). 적정 수신료 수준의 분석. <방송연구>, 여름호, 129-156.
  • 이민웅·이창근·최용주·홍석경 (2008). <디지털미디어 전환기, 해외 공영방송의 공공성 확보방안 조사연구>. 경기: 방송통신위원회.
  • 이병섭 (2005). 방송통신 융합시대 공영방송의 합리적인 재원확보 방안. <한국방송학회 세미나 및 보고서>, 37-54.
  • 이종관 (2015, 2, 26). 공영방송 재정안정화의 사회경제적 의미. <한국언론학회 세미나 자료집>, 19-38.
  • 이종관·심영섭 (2013). <공영방송 재원구조 관련 법･제도 개선방안 연구>. 경기: 방송통신위원회.
  • 이창근 (2012). 공영방송의 공공가치(Public Value) 개념에 대한 이론적 검토. <한국언론학회 학술대회 발표논문집>, 173-173.
  • 임흥순 (2010). 시기와 요인에 따른 KBS의 재원변화에 대한 연구. <한국광고홍보학보>, 12권 1호, 319-355.
  • 장인호·지성우 (2013). 방송시장변화에 대응하기 위한 공영방송 재원구조의 개선에 관한 연구. <법학논총>, 20권 3호, 189-222.
  • 정연우 (2010). 공영방송의 정체성과 수신료 인상의 정당성에 관한 논의. <방송통신연구>, 70호, 60-86.
  • 정용준 (2006). 보편적 서비스와 수용자 복지. <방송통신연구>, 63호, 31-58.
  • 정용준 (2015). BBC 의 공론장 모델에 대한 역사적 평가. <방송통신연구>, 91호, 165-184.
  • 정준희 (2015). 공영방송과 수신료, 그리고 그 사이의 공백: 공공 미디어 서비스의 미래 관점에서. <미디어와 교육>, 5권 1호, 7-13.
  • 조항제 (2009). <한국방송의 이론과 역사>. 서울: 논형.
  • 조항제 (2014). <한국 공영 방송의 정체성>. 서울: 컬처룩.
  • 최세경 (2015). 국내 공영방송 수신료 인상의 타당성에 관한 연구: 재정건전성과 시청자 복지를 중심으로. <방송문화연구>, 27권 2호, 159-193.
  • 최영묵 (2010). 한국 공영방송과 TV수신료에 관한 고찰. <사회과학연구>, 23권 1호, 151-181.
  • 한동섭 (2005, 4월). <공영방송 수신료제도에 대한 전문가 인식조사>. 한국언론정보학회 학술대회, 27-41.
  • 황근 (2012). <공영방송 공적 재원 확보를 위한 제도 개선방안>. 경기: 방송통신위원회.