Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
The Korean Society for Journalism & Communication (KSJCS)
[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies - Vol. 66, No. 6, pp.31-63
ISSN: 2586-7369 (Online)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2022
Received 30 Aug 2022 Revised 12 Nov 2022 Accepted 18 Nov 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2022.66.6.002

존재론적 접근을 통한 포스트-진실 시대의 언론의 윤리적 태도 연구

주형일**
**영남대학교 언론정보학과 교수 spdm@yumail.ac.kr
Exploring Journalism Ethics in the Post-Truth Era using the Concept of Ontological Truth
Hyoungil Joo**
**Professor, Department of Media and Communication, Yeungnam University spdm@yumail.ac.kr

초록

이 논문은 포스트-진실 시대의 언론의 윤리적 태도와 관련해 기존 언론윤리 담론의 토대가 된 진실 개념과는 다른 진실 개념을 통해 윤리적 태도에 접근할 것을 제안한다. 일반적으로, 일치성으로서의 진실 개념은 객관주의 저널리즘 담론을 구성하는 핵심이었고 일관성으로서의 진실 개념은 탐사 저널리즘 담론을 지탱해 왔다. 유용성으로서의 진실 개념은 공공 저널리즘 담론을 구성하는 데 기반이 된다. 이 진실들은 언론이 추구하고 달성해야 할 목적으로 제시된다. 이 논문은 언론이 도달해야 할 목적으로서의 진실이 아닌 언론의 존재 토대로서의 진실에 대해 고찰한다. 이 논문은 하이데거의 진실 개념을 바탕으로 신유물론의 수행성 개념과 존재론적 전회의 주장을 참조해 존재론적 진실 개념을 고안하고 이를 언론의 새로운 윤리적 태도를 구성하는 데 필요한 핵심 개념으로 제안한다. 존재론적 진실이란 행위자가 다른 행위자들과 상호작용하는 과정에서 드러나는 사건 겸 의미로 행위자의 세계를 보여주는 것이다. 언론 생태계는 개별 언론들이 물질-담론적 실천들을 통해 현상으로 나타나는 과정에서 각자의 진실을 드러내면서 서로 충돌하고 번역하고 공존하는 곳이다. 개별 언론은 주위 환경이나 다른 언론들, 수용자들과의 관계 안에서 언론으로서의 항상성을 유지하기 위해 계속 노력하고 다른 언론의 진실을 번역하고 이해하려 노력해야 한다. 이것이 언론이 가져야 할 윤리적 태도이다.

Abstract

This article proposes to approach the ethics of journalism through the concept of ontological truth. Until now, the concept of truth as correspondence has been central to the construction of objectivist journalism, and the concept of truth as coherence has underpinned investigative journalism. The concept of truth as utility is the foundation on which public journalism rests. These three kinds of truths are epistemological because they are based on the relationship between statements and objects. Based on Heidegger's concept of truth, this article refines the concept of ontological truth by referring to the new materialism's concept of performativity and the arguments of ontological turn. Ontological truth presents the actor's world as the meaning-event that emerges during the actor's interaction with other actors. Ontological truth is how an entity reveals itself through events. The journalistic ecosystem is where different media with different truths collide, translate and coexist. The fact that each journalistic medium has its truth means that each medium creates its meaning-event to build its world. It is not that there are many opinions with various views on one event, but that there are various events with multiple meanings. The meanings-events of individual media, that is, the truths of individual media, are different. There is no absolute truth that all journalistic media must admit. No truth or world can be agreed upon or shared through discussion. The journalistic ecosystem is not a universe but a multiverse. In this situation, the core of the ethical attitude that the individual journalistic media should adopt is not to be disconnected from other media and to try to translate the truth of other media. Each medium should always connect with other actors to reveal their meanings-events and translate the meanings-events of other media. The meaning-event is not fixed, but fluid. It continues to change within the interaction between the actors. If the meaning-event is fluid, so is its translation. In the permanent interaction with the actors, the individual journalistic medium reveals itself as a phenomenon, creating both event and meaning. The ontological truth is thus neither a goal for journalism to pursue nor a standard by which to determine whether journalism is appropriate. It is the basis that enables journalism and the place where the existence of journalism is revealed. The journalistic media must continue to strive to maintain homeostasis in the journalistic ecosystem. They must build relationships with other media and audiences. They should strive to translate and understand the truths of other media. This is the ethical attitude that journalism should have.

Keywords:

ontological truth, journalism ethics, objectivity, aletheia, performativity

키워드:

존재론적 전회, 알레테이아, 언론윤리, 수행성, 존재론적 진실

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the 2022 Yeungnam University Research Grant(이 연구는 2022년도 영남대학교 학술연구조성비에 의한 것임).

References

  • Bae, S.-H. (2005). Jinli, Jinsil, Cham: Three Korean translations of ‘Truth’. Korean Journal of Philosophy, 84, 129-155.
  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801-831. [https://doi.org/10.1086/345321]
  • Bird, E., & Dardenne, R. W. (1988). Myth, chronicle and story. In J. W. Carey (Ed.), Media, myths and narratives: Television and the press (pp. 67-86). London, UK: Sage.
  • Boesman, J., & Meijer. I. C. (2018). Nothing but the facts?: Exploring the discursive space for storytelling and truth-seeking in journalism. Journalism Practice, 12(8), 997-1007. [https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1493947]
  • Butler, J. (2006). Gender trouble. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Carlson, M. (2018). The information politics of journalism in a post-truth age. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1879-1888. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1494513]
  • Carson, A., & Farhall, K. (2018). Understanding collaborative investigative journalism in a “post-truth” age. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1899-1911. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1494515]
  • Cohen, L. J. (1978). The coherence theory of truth. Philosophical Studies, 34, 351-360. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00364702]
  • Davidson, D. (2001). Inquiries into truth and interpretation (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Clarendin Press. [https://doi.org/10.1093/0199246297.001.0001]
  • Dewsbury, J. D. (2000). Performativity and the event: Enacting a philosophy of difference. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 473-496. [https://doi.org/10.1068/d200t]
  • Ferré, J. P. (2008). A short history of media ethics in the united states. In L. Wilkins & C. G. Christians (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Mass Media Ethics (pp. 29-43). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Foucault, M. (1966). Les mot et les choses. Paris, France: Gallimard.
  • Gans, H. (1979). Deciding what's news: A study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, newsweek, and time. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
  • Glanzberg, M. (2018). The Oxford Handbook of truth, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199557929.001.0001]
  • Glasser, T. L., & Ettema, J. S. (1989). Investigative journalism and the moral order. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 6. 1-20. [https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038909366728]
  • Haack, S. (1987). Realism. Synthese, 73(2), 275-299. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484743]
  • Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und zeit. Halle, Germany: M. Niemeyer.
  • Hersey, J. (1980). The legend on the license. Yale Review, 70, 1-25.
  • Holbraad, M. (2009). Ontography and alterity: Defining anthropological truth. Social Analysis, 53, 80-93. [https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2009.530205]
  • James, W. (1907). Pragmatism's conception of truth. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 4(6), 141-155. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2012189]
  • Jeong, W.-G. (2010). A metaphysical consideration of the nature of morality? Monism or dualism?. CHUL HAK SA SANG : Journal of Philosophical Ideas, 38, 99-134. [https://doi.org/10.15750/chss..38.201011.004]
  • Jung, K. H. (2021). How the partisanship is being revealing in Youtube political channels by personal broadcasting in Korea? : Through in-depth interviews with young political Youtubers. Journal of Communication Research, 58(3), 46-109.
  • Jung, S. (2021). A study to increase the influence of fact check news : Focusing on the effect of fact check news on the audience. Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, 35(1), 235-282.
  • Kim, S. (2019). Regarding the truth in/about the ‘post-truth’ era : A view on journalism and the politics of truth. Media & Society, 27(4), 49-103.
  • Kim, T. O. (2008). Theoretical approach to the research of communication ethics in Europe and US. The Korean Civic Ethics Review, 21(2), 215-234.
  • Lehrer, K. (1986). The coherence theory of knowledge. Philosophical Topics, 14(1), 5–25. [https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics198614112]
  • Lee, J.-K. (2019). Post-truth society and the role of journalism. Press Arbitration. 152, 78-81.
  • Lee, S. (2019). The lively possibility and tension of truth experience : Heidegger's interpretation of Plato in his lecture Parmenides and the meaning of political existence. Korean Political Science Review, 53(5), 31-51. [https://doi.org/10.18854/kpsr.2019.53.5.002]
  • Lilly, W. S. (1892). On right and wrong. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
  • Maras, S. (2013). Objectivity in journalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Milton, J. (1644). Areopagitica.
  • Nam, J.-I. (2010). The process of construction of Korean journalism ethics as job ideology. Korean Journal of Communication & Information, 50, 73-93.
  • Nam, J.-I. (2020). Divisions and gaps in the Korean public sphere. Literature & Society, 33(4), 6-22.
  • Rhee, J. W. (2013). Communication and truth. Communication Theories, 9(4), 100-135.
  • Rhee, J. W. (2017). A Habermasian perspective to journalism ethics at the digital news age. Communication Theories, 13(3), 86-128.
  • Seol, M. (2016). An ethical reinterpretation of Heidegger’s thought of being in comparison with classical metaphysical ethics. Journal of the Society of Philosophical Studies, 115, 109-136. [https://doi.org/10.23908/JSPS.2016.12.115.109]
  • Song, K.-H. (2002). Newspaper and truth. In K.-H. Song (Ed.), Democratic press, national press 1(pp. 109-116). Gyeonggi: Hangilsa.
  • Sung, H. Y. (2019). The technological revolution and the crisis of journalism. Kwanhun Journal, 61(3), 3-8.
  • Waisbord, S. (2018). Truth is what happens to news : On journalism, fake news, and post-truth. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1866-1878. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492881]
  • Ward, S. (1999). Pragmatic news objectivity: Objectivity with a human face. Cambridge, MA: The Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University.
  • Zelizer, B. (2004). When facts, truth, and reality are God-terms: On journalism’s uneasy place in cultural studies. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 1(1), 100-119. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1479142042000180953]

Appendix

부록

  • 김수미 (2019). “포스트-진실” 시대의 진실에 대하여 : 저널리즘과 진실의 정치에 대한 소고. <언론과 사회>, 27권 4호, 49-103.
  • 김춘옥 (2008). 歐美 미디어윤리 연구진화에 대한 이론적 접근 : 언론윤리의 이론화를 중심으로. <한국시민윤리학회보>, 21권 2호, 215-234.
  • 남재일 (2010). 직업이데올로기로서의 한국 언론윤리의 형성과정. <한국언론정보학보>, 50호, 73-93.
  • 남재일 (2020). 한국 공론장의 분열과 틈새. <문학과 사회>, 33권 4호, 6-22.
  • 배식한 (2005). 진리, 진실, 참. <철학>, 84호, 129-155.
  • 설민 (2016). 고전 형이상학적 윤리학과의 비교를 통한 하이데거 존재사유의 윤리학적 재해석. <철학연구>, 115호, 109-136.
  • 성한용 (2019). 기술혁명과 저널리즘의 위기. <관훈저널>, 61권 3호, 3-8.
  • 송건호 (2002). 신문과 진실. 송건호 (편), <민주언론 민족언론 1> (109-116쪽). 경기: 한길사.
  • 이상원 (2019). 진리 경험의 역동성과 긴장성 : 하이데거의 『파르메니데스』에 나타난 플라톤 해석의 정치적 함의. <한국정치학회보>, 53권 5호, 31-51.
  • 이재경 (2019). 탈진실 사회와 저널리즘의 역할. <언론중재>, 152권, 78-81.
  • 이준웅 (2013). 소통은 진리를 위한 것인가? <커뮤니케이션 이론>, 9권 4호, 100-135.
  • 이준웅 (2017). 디지털 뉴스 시대의 언론 윤리. <커뮤니케이션 이론>, 13권 3호, 86-128.
  • 정금희 (2021). 정치 유튜브 개인 방송에서 ‘정파성’은 어떻게 발현되는가? : 청년 정치 유튜버의 심층 인터뷰를 중심으로. <언론정보연구>, 58권 3호, 46-109.
  • 정성욱 (2021). 팩트체크 뉴스의 영향력 확대를 위한 연구 : 팩트체크 뉴스가 수용자에게 미치는 효과를 중심으로. <한국방송학보>, 35권 1호, 235-282.
  • 정원규 (2010). 도덕의 본성에 관한 형이상학적 고찰. <철학사상>, 38호, 99-134.
  • Butler, J. (2006). Gender trouble. New York, NY: Routledge. 조현준 (역) (2008). <젠더 트러블>. 경기: 문학동네.
  • Foucault, M. (1966). Les mot et les choses. Paris, France: Gallimard. 이규현 (역) (2019). <말과 사물>. 경기: 살림.
  • Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und zeit. Halle, Germany: M. Niemeyer. 전양범 (역) (2008). <존재와 시간>. 서울: 동서문화사.
  • Milton, J. (1644). Areopagitica. 임상원 (역) (1998). <아레오파지티카: 존 밀턴의 언론 출판 자유에 대한 선언>. 경기: 나남.